Chief District Judge Brian Morris issued a preliminary injunction that blocked the state of Montana from instituting and enforcing its restrictions on drag performances in public venues, reported Jurist. The case is in the US District Court for the District of Montana Butte Division.
Morris found that the plaintiffs in the case were
likely to succeed on the merits of their claims that House Bill 359 is
unconstitutional because it violates the First and Fifth Amendments to the US Constitution.
On the First Amendment claim, Morris noted that 359
imposes both content-based restrictions and viewpoint-based regulation, which
leads to a strict scrutiny analysis. To pass strict
scrutiny, the legislature must have passed the law to further a compelling
governmental interest and narrowly tailored the law to achieve that interest.
Morris also noted that 359’s legislative history provided “substantial
evidence” that an “impermissible purpose” was behind 359’s enactment. This
impermissible purpose was to “target the speech and expression of LGBTQ+
community members, particularly trans, Two-Spirit, and gender non-conforming
people.” Morris then concluded that 359 was not narrowly tailored to serve a
compelling state interest because “[f]orcing protected expression to take place
under a cover of darkness, rather than banning it outright, does not save H.B.
359 from constitutional infirmity.” Thus, Morris concluded that the plaintiffs
would likely succeed on their First Amendment challenge.
For the Fifth Amendment challenge, Morris found that
359 is likely unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. Morris noted that the law
“fails to define the conduct it criminalizes ‘with sufficient definiteness that
ordinary people can understand what conduct is prohibited.'” Morris also noted
that there was “no evidence” submitted that minors face any harm from
drag-related events.
House Bill 359 prohibits minors from attending
“sexually oriented shows.” Additionally, the law bans drag story hour in public
schools and libraries and bans “sexually oriented performances” in public
schools, public libraries and public property where minors are present.
This is not the only litigation revolving around
state bans on drag performances. Last month, a US federal judge in
Texas ruled that the state’s ban on drag
performances was unconstitutional and blocked it from going into effect.
To read more CLICK HERE
No comments:
Post a Comment