Saturday, November 30, 2024

UK lawmakers approve assisted suicide for dying or terminally ill patients

After an emotive and at times impassioned debate, Britain’s lawmakers voted to allow assisted dying for terminally ill patients in England and Wales under strict conditions, opening the way to one of the most profound social changes in the country in decades, reported The New York Times.

By 330 votes to 275, members of Parliament gave their support to a bill that would permit doctors to help some terminally ill patients to end their lives.

Friday’s vote was not the final say on the matter for Parliament, as it will now be scrutinized in parliamentary committees and amendments to the bill may be put forward. But it is a landmark political moment, setting the stage for a significant shift that some have likened to Britain’s legalization of abortion in 1967 and the abolition of the death penalty in 1969.

The new legislation would apply to a narrow group: Applicants would have to be over 18, diagnosed with a terminal illness and have been given no more than six months to live. Two doctors and a judge would be required to give their approval, and the fatal drugs would have to be self-administered.

Assisted dying is already legal in a handful of European countries, as well as in Canada, New Zealand, 10 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.

The bill debated on Friday was proposed by a Labour Party member of parliament, Kim Leadbeater, but lawmakers were given the freedom to vote with their consciences, instead of being expected to vote along a party-line, meaning the outcome was impossible to predict.

ImageKim Leadbeater in London last month. The Labour lawmaker told Parliament that her legislation addressed “one of the most significant issues of our time.”Credit...Jaimi Joy/Reuters

During almost five hours of debate on Friday in a crowded parliamentary chamber, raw divisions were revealed over an issue that transcended political affiliations.

Meg Hillier, a Labour lawmaker, said the legislation would “cross a Rubicon,” by involving the state in the death of some of those it governs. “This is a fundamental change in the relationship between the state and the citizen, and the patient and their doctor,” she said.

But Kit Malthouse, a Conservative lawmaker, argued in support of the bill, saying, “The deathbed for far too many is a place of misery, torture and degradation, a reign of blood and vomit and tears.” He added, “I see no compassion and beauty in that — only profound human suffering.”

To read more CLICK HERE

Friday, November 29, 2024

Idaho Supreme Court says man who survived execution can be executed again

Idaho’s high court dismissed a final state appeal from Thomas Creech, leaving the federal courts to decide whether Idaho can try again to execute its longest-serving death row prisoner after a failed attempt earlier this year, reported the Idaho Stateman. The Idaho Supreme Court unanimously rejected Creech’s arguments that a second execution attempt would represent cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

In February, the execution team was unable after nearly an hour to find a vein in Creech’s body suitable for an IV to lethally inject him, and prison leaders called off the execution. Creech became the first-ever prisoner to survive an execution in Idaho and just the sixth in U.S. history to survive one by lethal injection, according to the Washington, D.C.-based Death Penalty Information Center. Creech alleged in his appeal that another lethal injection attempt, this time possibly with a stepped-up method known as a central line IV, which uses a catheter through a jugular in the neck, or vein in the upper thigh or chest, would violate his constitutional rights.

 A lower state court ruled against the claim last month. “The application does not support, with any likelihood, the conclusion that the pain other inmates purportedly suffered in other states establishes an ‘objectively intolerable’ risk of pain for Creech, as required under the Eighth Amendment,” Idaho Chief Justice G. Richard Bevan wrote for the court. Idaho’s five justices also ruled against Creech in a similar appeal earlier this month. The court’s ruling Wednesday sided with Idaho Attorney General Raúl Labrador’s office and was determined on legal briefs alone.

No oral arguments were scheduled in the appeal. Justice Robyn M. Brody, left, and Chief Justice G. Richard Bevan are two of the five members of the Idaho Supreme Court. They ruled unanimously against an appeal from death row prisoner Thomas Creech on Wednesday.

Justice Colleen Zahn recused herself from Creech’s appeal and was replaced by Senior Justice Roger Burdick, who retired from the court in 2021. Zahn cited her decadelong tenure in the Attorney General’s Office before her appointment to the Supreme Court bench, state courts spokesperson Nate Poppino previously told the Idaho Statesman. The State Appellate Public Defender’s Office, Creech’s attorneys in the case, did not respond Wednesday to a request for comment from the Idaho Statesman.

The Attorney General’s Office declined to comment after the ruling. The Federal Defender Services of Idaho, which represents Creech in three other active appeals in federal court, declined to comment, including on its own federal appeal with the same legal arguments as the case just dismissed by the Idaho Supreme Court. Creech also has declined any interviews at this time through his attorneys. Creech was set to be executed earlier this month after he was served with a death warrant from Ada County Prosecuting Attorney Jan Bennetts’ office.

A federal judge issued a stay and hit pause on the scheduled execution timeline before Idaho could follow through on the state’s first execution in more than a dozen years. Creech, 74, has been incarcerated for 50 years on five murder convictions, including three victims in Idaho. His standing death sentence stems from the May 1981 beating death of fellow prisoner David D. Jensen, 23, for which Creech pleaded guilty. Before that, Creech was convicted of the November 1974 shooting deaths of two men in Valley County in Idaho, and later the shooting death of a man in Oregon and another man’s death by strangulation in California.

To read more CLICK HERE

Thursday, November 28, 2024

Illinois schools ask police to stop ticketing students

In the strongest rebuke yet of Illinois school districts that ask police to ticket misbehaving students, the state attorney general has declared that the practice — still being used across the state — is illegal and should stop, reported ProPublica.

The attorney general’s office, which had been investigating student ticketing in one of Illinois’ largest high school districts, found that Township High School District 211 in Palatine broke the law when administrators directed police to fine its students for school-based conduct, and that the practice had an “unjustified disparate impact” on Black and Latino students.

“We strongly encourage other districts and police departments to review their policies and practices,” the office told ProPublica.

But the attorney general’s office did not alert other districts of its findings, which came in July, and did not issue guidance that the common practice violates the law. That means its findings against the suburban Chicago district could have a narrow effect.

The office also said that it is not investigating other districts for similar civil rights violations.

In 2022, a ProPublica and Chicago Tribune investigation, “The Price Kids Pay,” revealed how local police officers were writing students tickets that resulted in fines of up to $750. The tickets, for violating local ordinances, are considered noncriminal offenses and can be punishable only by a fine. The misbehavior included having vape pens, missing class, and participating in verbal or minor physical altercations.

In response, Gov. JB Pritzker and two state superintendents of education said schools should not rely on police to handle student misconduct.

State lawmakers have tried several times to pass legislation intended to stop the practice by specifically prohibiting schools from involving police in minor disciplinary matters. But the bills have stalled. School officials have argued ticketing is a necessary tool to manage student behavior, and some lawmakers worried that limiting officers’ role in schools could lead to unsafe conditions.

Rep. La Shawn Ford, a Democrat from Chicago, told ProPublica this month that he plans to try again next year. “We don’t want police doing schools’ work,” Ford said.

He said revised legislation will aim to address school officials’ concerns and will make clear that school employees can still involve police in criminal matters.

“What will really address this is a state law that would have an impact on all Illinois schools. That is the only possible way I see because it is so pervasive across Illinois,” said Angie Jiménez, an attorney at the National Center for Youth Law, which has pushed for reforms in Illinois law.

To read more CLICK HERE

Tuesday, November 26, 2024

PA lawmaker wants mandatory death penalty for illegals who kill

 A Pennsylvania state lawmaker is proposing a bill that would implement a mandatory death penalty for “illegal aliens convicted of murder,” reported WHTM-TV in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.

State Representative Eric Davanzo (R-Westmoreland) says he plans to introduce the bill while citing cases across the country where those who have entered the United States illegally have been convicted of serious crimes.

Davanzo specifically cited the case of Laken Riley, a University of Georgia student who was killed by a Venezuelan man earlier this year after he unlawfully entered the country. He also cited the search for Brazilian native Danelo Cavalcante in Pennsylvania after he escaped the Chester County prison following a conviction for killing his ex-girlfriend.

“At a time when the Federal government has demonstrated an unmistakable aversion to countering this ever-increasing surge in illegal immigration and some district attorneys of this Commonwealth refuse to honor Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s detainers, drastic measures are needed to deter violent crime and illegal migration, promote justice for victims and their families, and ensure uniformity in punishment,” said Davanzo in a memo to House members. “I believe that any individual who unlawfully enters this country and commits a murder should face the most severe consequences under our laws. This legislation demonstrates that the House of Representatives is, unlike the Federal Government, willing to protect its citizens and ensure justice for victims.”

In Pennsylvania, the death penalty can only be applied in cases where a defendant is found guilty of first-degree murder if aggravating factors are present in the conviction.

Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro said last year we would block the death penalty during his administration and called for the practice to be abolished.

“The Commonwealth shouldn’t be in the business of putting people to death. Period,” said Shapiro in 2023.

Attorney General-elect Dave Sunday said during his 2024 campaign that he would seek the death penalty.

Since 1976, three people have been executed by lethal injection in Pennsylvania with the last being in 1999, according to the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections. There are currently 95 people sitting on Pennsylvania’s death row, the most recent being added in May 2023.

To read more CLICK HERE

Monday, November 25, 2024

Mangino discusses Susan Smith parole hearing with Ted Rowlands of Court TV

Watch my interview with Ted Rowlands of Court TV discussing the parole hearing of Susan Smith, the South Carolina woman who murdered her two children 30 years ago.

To watch the interview CLICK HERE

Saturday, November 23, 2024

Václav Havel: 'There is only one thing I will not concede: that it might be meaningless to strive in a good cause'

One of the great spirits of modern times, the Czech playwright and dissident Václav Havel, wrote in “Summer Meditations,” “There is only one thing I will not concede: that it might be meaningless to strive in a good cause.” During the long Soviet domination of his country, Havel fought valiantly for liberal democracy, inspiring in others acts of resilience and protest. He was imprisoned for that. Then came a time when things changed, when Havel was elected President and, in a Kafka tale turned on its head, inhabited the Castle, in Prague. Together with a people challenged by years of autocracy, he helped lead his country out of a long, dark time. 

Mangino joins Nancy Grace to discuss the mysterious death of Ellen Greenburg.

Great to join Nancy Grace on Crime Stories to discuss the  mysterious death of Ellen Greenburg.

To watch the interview CLICK HERE

Friday, November 22, 2024

Mangino Joins Tommy Pope to discuss Susan Smith' parole hearing on Court TV's Vinnie Politan Investigates


 To watch the interview CLICK HERE

Alabama carries out third execution using nitrogen gas

The 22nd Execution of 2024

Alabama death row inmate Carey Dale Grayson on November 21, 2024 became the third inmate in the U.S. to be executed by nitrogen gas, reported the USA Today.

Grayson, 50, was executed for the torture, bludgeoning and mutilation of Vickie Lynn DeBlieux on Feb. 21, 1994. Deblieux, 37, was hitchhiking from southeastern Tennessee to visit her mother in West Monroe, Louisiana, when Grayson, then 19, and three other teens picked her up along and soon after proceeded to kill her, court records say. He was pronounced dead at 6:33 p.m., according to the Alabama Department of Corrections.

The execution is the 22nd in the U.S. this year and the sixth in Alabama, which has put three of the men to death using nitrogen gas, a controversial method that some witnesses describe as torture.

Republican Gov. Kay Ivey said in a statement that "an execution by nitrogen hypoxia bares no comparison to the death and dismemberment Ms. DeBlieux experienced."

"I pray for her loved ones that they may continue finding closure and healing," she said.

Jodi DeBlieux Haley, who was 12 when her mother was murdered, talked about what a special person she was at a news conference following the execution.

"She was unique. She was spontaneous. She was wild. She was funny," Haley said. "She was gorgeous to boot. I don't know what it is like to have a mother while going through life. Graduation, marriage, children, hurts and joys. I've had to experience life without her presence because all those opportunities were stolen from her."

Here's what you need to know about Grayson's execution, including his last meal and last words, and why Haley is opposed to the death penalty despite the devastating loss of her mother.

What were Carey Dale Grayson's last words?

Unlike many inmates who deliver last words that are apologetic to their victims’ families and loving to their own families, Grayson cussed and flipped his middle fingers.

When given the chance to say his last words, he said: “Yeah … you need to (expletive) off!” His microphone was quickly cut off and the execution process began.

When the nitrogen began flowing, Grayson tightly clenched his hands, took deep gasps, shook his head vigorously and pulled against his restraints. He appeared to lose consciousness at 6:18 p.m., about six minutes after the gas began flowing.

Alabama Department of Corrections Commissioner John Q. Hamm said after the execution that Grayson's movements at the beginning of the process appeared to be "for show."

What was Carey Dale Grayson's last meal?

Grayson's last meal was soft tacos, beef burritos, tostada, chips, guacamole, and Mountain Dew Blast.

What was Carey Dale Grayson convicted of?

On Feb. 21, 1994, DeBlieux was dropped off by a friend in Chattanooga near Interstate 59, where she began catching rides southwest. At some point, Grayson − who was 19 − and three other teens picked DeBlieux up along a Jefferson County interstate in Alabama, about 15 miles northeast of Birmingham.

The teens stopped at a wooded area on Bald Mountain, and proceeded to beat, stomp and kick DeBlieux. Testimony showed Grayson and another teen stood on her throat to kill her.

Her body was eventually tossed off a cliff but the teens returned later and mutilated her corpse, cutting the body at least 180 times, removing a portion of a lung and cutting off her fingers, court records show.

The teens became suspects in the murder when one of the boys showed one of DeBlieux's fingers to a friend.

In addition to Grayson, a jury convicted Kenny Loggins, Trace Duncan and Louis Mangione in the murder. Duncan, Loggins and Mangione had their death sentences reversed and were each given life in prison without the possibility of parole. The move came in 2005 after the U.S. Supreme Court banned the execution of people who were younger than 18 when they committed a crime.

Victim's daughter condemns 'state-sanctioned homicide'

While losing her mother ripped Haley's life apart, she doesn't lay all the blame on Grayson, saying that he faced severe physical and sexual abuse as a child and was still a boy when he was thrown out on the street.

“I have to wonder how all of this slips through the cracks of the justice system," she said. "Because society failed this man as a child and my family suffered because of it."

She said she's opposed to the death penalty because "it's not right" and that "murdering inmates under the guise of justice needs to stop."

“State-sanctioned homicide needs never be listed as cause of death,” she said. “I don’t know who we think we are. To be in such a modern time, we regress when we implement this punishment. I hope and pray my mother’s death will invoke these changes and give her senseless death some purpose."

More about Carey Dale Grayson's execution method

Grayson was killed by nitrogen hypoxia, which was used for the first time in the U.S. when Alabama executed Kenneth Eugene Smith in January. Smith’s execution by the method drew national and international scorn and media attention, including a protest from the Vatican.

Smith appeared to writhe and convulse on the gurney for at least four minutes during the execution. State and prison systems' officials had said before the execution that Smith should lose consciousness “within seconds,” and be dead within minutes once the gas started flowing into the full-face mask Smith wore.

Alabama Department of Corrections Commissioner John Q. Hamm called Smith’s execution “textbook,” in a news conference about half an hour after the Smith died.

Alan Eugene Miller's September execution was the second by nitrogen gas in Alabama.

With the nitrogen hypoxia method, the condemned breathes pure nitrogen through a mask that displaces oxygen in their system. Proponents claim it is an almost instant and painless method. Opponents claim it amounts to torture.

Who was Carey Dale Grayson?

Grayson had bipolar disorder and his mother died when he was 3 after battling mental illness, according to court records.

A forensic psychologist testified that Grayson was "in a manic state" during the murder but that he "did know the difference between right and wrong and was able to appreciate the nature and quality or wrongfulness of his acts, court records say.

In a police interview, Grayson described the younger teens as committing the most heinous acts during the crime. When asked about why they killed DeBlieux, court records say, he told police that he didn't know and that "it was not his problem.” 

To read more CLICK HERE

Milwaukee 10-year-old charged with 1st degree murder will face trial as adult

The criminal case against a 12-year-old Milwaukee boy accused of shooting his mother to death two years ago will remain in adult court, a judge ruled, reported the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.

The decision on Monday by Milwaukee County Juvenile Court Judge Jane V. Carroll gives direction to the case; the child's defense lawyers argued for months was more appropriate for the juvenile system.

Adult court carries much longer terms of confinement than juvenile court, which focuses on rehabilitation and offers more services.

The child was 10 at the time of the shooting, and was charged with first-degree intentional homicide.

This now means the child could be subject to a sentence of up to life in prison, if he is convicted. He is expected to appear in court again on Dec. 5.

Here is how prosecutors say the incident unfolded

According to court records, the boy told police he became upset with his mother when she refused to buy him something on Amazon and for waking him up early one morning.

Prosecutors alleged he got ahold of his mother’s gun from a lockbox, using his mother’s key, and fatally shot her in November 2022.

What is the law in Wisconsin concerning juvenile charged with serious crimes?

In Wisconsin, children and teens can automatically be charged in adult court, depending on their age and the severity of what they are accused of doing.

State law allows for children as young as 10 to be charged as adults for certain serious crimes, at least to start the case. Those crimes include first-degree intentional homicide, first-degree reckless homicide and attempted first-degree intentional homicide.

Prosecutors have for months argued the seriousness of the crime warranted adjudicating the matter in adult court.

The child's lawyers pushed during a series of hearings that began in March for a reverse waiver to have the matter handled within the juvenile justice system, saying he would receive more specialized treatment and age-appropriate services there.

Prosecutors maintained the crime warranted adult court because it was serious and demonstrated some level of intention and planning on the child's part. Moving the case to juvenile court, where the case could be disposed of anywhere from a year to when the child turns 25, would "depreciate the seriousness of the offense" they argued.

The child remained in custody on Monday. The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel is not identifying him because of his age.

To read more CLICK HERE

Thursday, November 21, 2024

Mangino discusses ice axe murder of elderly man by his adult daughter on Law and Crime Network

I joined Sierra Gillespie on Law and Crime Network to discuss the ice axe murder of an elderly father by his adult daughter over the presidential election.

To watch the interview CLICK HERE

Wednesday, November 20, 2024

Gaetz could become AG without Senate Approval through a recess appointment

Mr. Trump has made it clear that he wants the option of going around the Senate to install cabinet and other appointees without the chamber’s approval, reported The New York Times. He could do so with what is known as a “recess appointment,” which allows a president to act on his own when the Senate is not in session.

But it is not clear whether Republican senators would go along with that plan by going out of session at Mr. Trump’s request. Some of them have raised particular alarm at the selection of former Representative Matt Gaetz of Florida, the ethics-challenged, hard-right firebrand who has a habit of insulting fellow Republican lawmakers, for attorney general.

Mr. Trump could try to force the issue, invoking an untested clause of the Constitution that could be challenged and even end up before the Supreme Court.

Here’s how it works.

Recess appointments were meant to be a logistical fail-safe.

Article II of the Constitution says that the president can name officials “by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.” That has been interpreted for centuries to mean that the chamber is responsible for vetting and ultimately confirming the president’s nominees.

But when the Constitution was written in the country’s early days, travel was by horse, and the Senate often was out of session for weeks or months at a time. If a critical vacancy arose, senators could not necessarily convene quickly to confirm a replacement. So the founders included an exception that allowed the president to fill vacancies that arose during a recess without any action by the Senate.

That is known as a “recess appointment.” There is far less need for it in the era of cars and air travel, but presidents have invoked it in modern times as a matter of convenience and political expediency.

Recess appointments are common, but usually for lower-level officials.

Several presidents have used recess appointments. President Bill Clinton made 139 recess appointments, and President George W. Bush made 171, although neither used the maneuver to fill cabinet positions as Mr. Trump wants to do.

President Barack Obama filled 32 positions using recess appointments, including the assistant attorney general and several under secretary roles at various departments.

Because recess appointments were never designed to be permanent, the appointee’s term expires at the end of the next congressional session. There are also limitations on how and when a recess appointee can be paid.

Because of a constitutional quirk, neither chamber recesses for long.

Both the House and Senate frequently take long breaks. But to comply with a constitutional requirement that neither chamber adjourn for three days or more without the consent of the other, they typically convene for a brief period every three days.

Little business, if any, is conducted during these meetings, called “pro forma” sessions. They are also used to prevent recess appointments or pocket vetoes, a way of allowing a bill to die if it is left unsigned by the president when Congress adjourns. The sessions usually involve the saying of a prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance before a single member bangs the gavel to adjourn and restart the three-day clock.

In 2014, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that Mr. Obama had violated the Constitution by making recess appointments during a break in the Senate’s work when the chamber was convening pro forma sessions. Those breaks were too short to be considered recesses, the justices ruled.

They said the Senate must be out for at least 10 days for it to count as a recess for the purpose of the president’s appointment power.

Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader who is stepping down from his leadership role in the next Congress, filed an amicus brief in that case.

Trump could try to force a recalcitrant Senate to recess, but the power is untested.

Article II of the Constitution allows a president to adjourn one or both chambers of Congress under certain circumstances, including if the House and Senate disagree about when to be in session.

In that scenario, the Republican-led House could pass an adjournment resolution and if the Senate refused to approve it, Mr. Trump could, as the Constitution says, “adjourn them to such a time as he shall think proper.” In theory, he could then make recess appointments. It appears that no president has ever tried that particular maneuver.

Edward Whelan, a conservative scholar, wrote in a recent Washington Post opinion piece that the scenario was a “cockamamie scheme” that Speaker Mike Johnson should denounce and refuse to implement.

Even if he went along, it is highly likely that Democrats would follow Mr. McConnell’s example and challenge Mr. Trump’s move as unconstitutional, almost certainly landing the question before the Supreme Court. Such a case, however, could take a long time to be adjudicated. By then, a theoretical Attorney General Matt Gaetz could have run the Justice Department for months or years.

To read more CLICK HERE

 

Tuesday, November 19, 2024

'Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure'

 Gettysburg, Pennsylvania 161 years ago today:



Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battle-field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.

But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate—we can not consecrate—we can not hallow—this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us—that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion—that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain—that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom—and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.

Abraham Lincoln

 

Monday, November 18, 2024

North Carolina spent $200 million on death penalty since last execution in 2006

North Carolina has not carried out an execution since 2006. In 6 of the last 10 years, North Carolina has not sentenced a single defendant to death. Despite the reluctance of jurors to impose death sentences and the hesitation of prosecutors and politicians to conduct executions, the death penalty has been a significant expense for state taxpayers, according to The Charlotte Observer.

According to a study conducted by Duke University researchers, death penalty prosecutions cost the state roughly $11 million per year. This means North Carolina has likely spent about $200 million on death penalty cases since its last execution in 2006. The additional costs of the death penalty begin at the defendant’s initial trial. Supreme Court precedent demands two separate trials for capital defendants. One to determine the defendant’s guilt, much like a traditional trial. The second trial is a resource-intensive presentation of the defendant’s life and the circumstances of the offense. For these sentencing trials, capital defendants are entitled to services from a wide range of mental health experts who extensively research the defendant’s life to find reasons why they may not deserve a death sentence.

After a defendant is sentenced to death, they go through decades of appeals to ensure that they had a fair trial. At each of the nine stages of appeals, the defendant is entitled to an attorney, and courts typically hire additional experts. If any of these appeals are successful, then the defendant will be entitled to a new, two-stage trial. If the defendant is sentenced to death again, they restart the lengthy appellate process from the beginning.

Although increased litigation costs are the largest reasons for the expense of the death penalty, they are not alone. North Carolina currently houses 136 defendants on death row in Raleigh, which costs roughly $85,000 per year to maintain.

Additionally, if North Carolina were to continue executions, the state would have to spend significant time and money to acquire pentobarbital, a drug legally required for executions in North Carolina. Pentobarbital is no longer sold by American pharmaceutical companies for the purposes of execution.

In 2020, Arizona recently spent $1.5 million to acquire pentobarbital from an undisclosed source. In the time since then, the drug has only become rarer and more expensive. Each of these expenses, from two-stage trials, to paying out countless experts, litigating a seemingly endless set of appeals and procuring expensive drugs, could be avoided by instead sentencing all capital defendants in North Carolina to life in prison and eliminating the death penalty.

While some death penalty proponents may argue for cutting corners to save money in our death penalty system, this is not a feasible option. North Carolina is bound by well-established Supreme Court precedent that grants capital defendants many expensive rights and processes. Further, the appeals system and experts involved in the death penalty serve an important purpose. Without these safeguards, it would be significantly more likely for an innocent defendant to be sentenced to death.

North Carolina has no reason to invest so much time and money into killing, when the state could instead work to protect citizens’ lives today. Our state would be a safer, more compassionate place if we reinvest the millions of dollars we spend on our death penalty system each year into victim’s funds, police training and resources, and mental health services.

The time to abolish the death penalty is now.

To read more CLICK HERE

Sunday, November 17, 2024

No correlation between violent crime and criminal justice reform

 Radley Balko writes in The Watch:

There is very little evidence that criminal justice reforms or progressive prosecutors are responsible for the spike in violent crime. Multiple studies have found no correlation between reform and crime rates at all, and as far as I know just one study claimed to find a correlation between progressive prosecutors and a slight uptick property crime — but no link to violent crime.

But the more obvious reason to doubt any link is that between 2020 and roughly 2022 violent crime also went up everywhere, including in jurisdictions with traditional, law-and-order prosecutors. It then went on a steep, nationwide decline in 2022. That, too, has been a nationwide trend, including in jurisdictions that passed and sustained reforms, as well as those that retained progressive prosecutors.

But the narrative appears to be immune to data. The most high-profile loss last week in Los Angeles, where voters ousted district attorney George Gascón, one of the more well-known names in the progressive prosecutor movement. Gascón faced a revolt the moment he took office, as the prosecutors’ union went to court to get an injunction barring him from implementing reforms — reforms clearly supported by voters at the time — by arguing that they violated the rights of prosecutors. (That’s a hell of a sentence to write.) And they won.

Gascón then faced over two dozen more lawsuits from holdover prosecutors. They accused him of retaliation for publicly criticizing him, and of interfering with their cases by imposing the policies he was elected to implement. I can’t speak to the merit of specific accusations, but as someone who has been watching this stuff for 20 years, I can say that a reform-minded line prosecutor who publicly criticized a traditional DA the way these prosecutors went after Gascón would be fired in a heartbeat. L.A. prosecutors seem to think their “right” to implement carceral policies supersedes the will of the people they serve. And unfortunately, the courts seemed to agree, as some of these prosecutors won six and seven-figure awards. Still, Gascón survived two recall attempts before finally losing last week.

California voters also passed a ballot initiative to increase penalties for some drug crimes, and to allow felony charges for repeat low level theft offenders — a response to the widely-distributed myth that a 2014 initiative had effectively “legalized” shoplifting in the state. The state’s voters even rejected a ban on forced labor of incarcerated people.

To read more CLICK HERE

Saturday, November 16, 2024

Matt Gaetz nomination a litmus test for U.S. Senate

 President-elect Donald Trump's nomination of former Congressman Matt Gaetz as attorney general is not as outlandish as it appears. Gaetz who would serve at the top law enforcement official in the country, resigned from the United States House of Representatives only days before a, purportedly, scathing ethics report was going to be release.

The investigation was no secret, Gaetz allegedly had sex with a teenager and used illicit drugs. The police had investigated the matter as well.

Gaetz's nomination is not because he is the best available person for the job, far from it.  He is being sent to the U.S. Senate to test just how far GOP senators will let the soon to be president go.  If the senate confirms Gaetz the sky is the limit for President Trump.  Gaetz is a litmus test . . . 

Friday, November 15, 2024

Mangino appears with Nancy Grace on Merit Street Media's Crime Stories

Watch my interview with Crime Stories' Nancy Grace on Merit Street Media about the disappearance of Elisa Lam and the tragic discovery of her body in LA's Cecil Hotel.

To watch CLICK HERE

Thursday, November 14, 2024

Convenience store owner shoots Black child falsely accused of shoplifting

On November 10, 58-year-old Rick Chow, owner of Columbia’s Xpress Mart Shell Station in South Carolina, chased and shot 14-year-old Cyrus Carmack-Belton whom he falsely accused of shoplifting, reported Martie Bowser at Blavity News

According to local news station WLTX, Chow accused Carmack-Belton of stealing four water bottles.  

During a press conference on Monday, Sheriff Leon Lott revealed the teenager had not shoplifted anything from the store. He later described the shooting as “unjustified” and “senseless.”

As he commented on Sunday’s tragic event, Lott told the media and members of the community, “You don’t do what happened last night.”

The interaction between Chow and Carmack-Belton began around 8 p.m. The teen and the store owner argued after Chow accused the 14-year-old of stealing water he touched.

Although Carmack-Belton touched the bottles, surveillance footage showed he placed them back in the cooler.

After the teen left the store, Chow’s son chased Carmack-Belton into a nearby apartment complex.

Lott stated the teen tripped and fell before Chow shot him in the back after his son claimed the teen had a gun.

The outlet reports authorities confirmed Carmack-Belton had a gun, but he didn’t point it at the father and son.

The Richland County coroner, Naida Rutherford, reported the gunshot wound injured the teen’s heart.

She later took to social media to clear up any misinformation about the shooting, stating it would be ruled a homicide.

Lott was openly distraught during the press conference. The Daily Mail transcribed the transgressions he felt with Chow’s actions.

“You don’t shoot somebody in the back if he’s not a threat to you. It’s the same standard that we do, that cops have to live by. You have to be defending someone’s life or your life. There has to be immediate danger to you.”

He emphasized the teen was running away with his back turned and wasn’t pointing a gun at anyone.

“Even if he had shoplifted four bottles of water, it’s not something you shoot anyone over much less a 14-year-old.”

Since the shooting, the convenience store on Parklane Road has been vandalized and looted in retaliation for the murder.

Community members have held multiple protests and vigils at the location, demanding justice for the teenager.

To read more CLICK HERE

Wednesday, November 13, 2024

Indiana plans first execution in 15 years without the media present to witness

Prison staffers, the condemned’s friends and family members, and the victims’ family members may soon witness the state of Indiana’s first execution since 2009. But it’s likely that no independent witnesses will be included, reported News from the States.

Joseph Corcoran, who killed four people in 1997, is scheduled to be executed Dec. 18. In Indiana, the death penalty is only available for the crime of murder. It will also be the state’s first time killing a prisoner with pentobarbital instead of a traditional three-drug cocktail.

But public information on how it goes will come exclusively from the Department of Correction. That’s because Indiana law, in contrast to other states, doesn’t allow for media or other independent witnesses.

There were 13 federal executions during the last six months of Donald Trump’s first presidential term and reporters were allowed to witness them.

Tim Evans, of the Indianapolis Star, witnessed one of those executions in July of 2020. Here is what he wrote in a column.

“(Daniel Lewis) Lee looked up briefly at us. Two small hoses running from a stainless steel port in the green tile wall behind the gurney were attached to IVs. One in his left elbow, the other on his right hand. In a matter of minutes they would administer the lethal injection … Lee lay quietly as the drug flowed into his veins. His chest rose and dropped slowly. At a couple of points over the next two to three minutes Lee fluttered his lips, like he was blowing bubbles. But nothing came out. His head bobbed up and to the right, then dropped back down. He appeared to run his tongue over his lips, and one hand twitched.”

Execution “is the most extreme punishment that society takes in any criminal case,” said John Blume, a professor at Cornell Law School professor and director of Cornell’s Death Penalty Project.

“And if you want the public to have confidence in the administration of justice, it seems to me like you would want transparency to be at its highest when (government) is taking its most draconian action,” Blume added.

Indiana Department of Correction spokeswoman Brandi Pahl wrote that “public information regarding who can be present” is available in statute

Indiana Code says only certain people may witness an execution: the state’s prison warden and designees, the prison physician and another doctor, the prison chaplain, the condemned’s spiritual adviser, a maximum of five friends or family members of the condemned, and a maximum of eight family members — at least 18 years old — of the victims or victims.

The law limits the latter witnesses to direct family members: children, parents, grandparents or siblings. It allows, upon request, a “support” room for additional victim family members.

The statute dates back to 1983 but was amended in 2002 to keep executioners’ identities confidential and let wardens keep out dangerous witnesses, and in 2006 to reduce the number of the condemned prisoners’ loved ones and to add victim family.

A 2015 analysis of states with the death penalty, published in the Mississippi College Law Review, found that Indiana was one of just five states that explicitly doesn’t allow reporters or “respectable” citizens as witnesses. That’s along with Colorado, Georgia, Texas and Wyoming.

Most states in the analysis — 20 — allowed for either a reporter or another independent witness, or didn’t rule them out. Four states expressly included reporters and other members of the public.

Blume, who spent years as a full-time capital defense practitioner, said the condemned’s loved ones may provide support during the execution or take action if something goes wrong. Victim family members, meanwhile, may get “closure or satisfaction.”

Media, he, said would serve as “neutral members of the public there to observe what happened and to report on it,” like if an execution is botched, or to settle disputes over what happened.

An estimated 3% of U.S. executions between 1890 and 2010 went wrong in some way, according to the 2014 book “Gruesome Spectacles: Botched Executions and America’s Death Penalty,” by Amherst College professor Austin Sarat.

In some cases recorded by the Death Penalty Information Center, the injection — billed as a more humane method of execution than gas, firing squad, or others — caused pain. And reports gathered by the center reveal differences in independent versus government accounts of the executions.

In 2014, Arizona murderer Joseph Wood was given a lethal injection, but took nearly two hours to die, gasping for breath during that time. A reporter who witnessed the execution counted 640 gasps but an Attorney General’s Office spokesperson said Wood was just asleep and snoring, according to the Arizona Republic.

“Because an execution is an official government function that uses taxpayer funds and resources, the process requires full transparency and accountability by government officials,” said Robin Maher, the executive director of the center.

“Secrecy statutes that prevent media witnesses from attending executions are contrary to democratic principles that promote public trust, ensure integrity, and prevent governmental abuse and overreach,” she continued, in a written statement. “Secrecy also greatly increases the chances that an execution will be botched because there is no opportunity for outside experts to fully examine and critique the process.”

Even states that let reporters observe may not allow witnesses to see preparatory procedures — like pokes for intravenous lines — or to hear audio from the execution chamber.

Blume said states often have a curtain or glass separating witnesses from the execution chamber, and that the curtain isn’t pulled until the execution is ready: condemned prison strapped down with a sheet draped across the body and I.V. lines placed.

He posited that governments may want to block viewing of what can be a “lengthy, painful” cutdown to make it “appear like the person peacefully drifts off to sleep. But it may also protect the condemned’s privacy, “to not have to endure this with a bunch of people that want to see him die watching.”

Blume believed someone besides prison staff should view the insertion, however, like the client’s defense lawyer. He observed that it’s often defenders who step in when the execution goes bad.

Many of the botched executions documented by the center involve difficulty finding veins suitable for the intraveneous lines. Condemned prisoners were stabbed more than a dozen times in some cases, and the execution was sometimes called off.

An executioner spent about an hour finding a usable vein for Oklahoma murderer Clayton Lockett in 2014. The Guardian reported in 2014 that, for the first three minutes after the drugs were delivered, he “struggled violently, groaned and writhed” — observations not mentioned in the state’s timeline. About 13 minutes later, before he was dead, the state closed the blinds from the viewing room into the execution chamber. Lockett died of a heart attack 30 minutes later.

It’s unclear what Hoosier witnesses will experience. Pahl, the Department of Correction spokeswoman, didn’t reply to questions about the agency’s administrative rules about execution proceedings.

Reporters will be standing outdoors.

“A media staging area will be available outside of the Indiana State Prison and additional information will be provided closer to the date of the execution,” Pahl wrote.

To read more CLICK HERE

Tuesday, November 12, 2024

President-elect Trump wants to expand the death penalty, he has proven he will

Throughout his campaign, President-elect Donald Trump signaled he would resume federal executions if he won and make more people eligible for capital punishment, including child rapists, migrants who kill U.S. citizens and law enforcement officers, and those convicted of drug and human trafficking, reported NBC News.

“These are terrible, terrible, horrible people who are responsible for death, carnage and crime all over the country,” Trump said of traffickers when he announced his 2024 candidacy. “We’re going to be asking everyone who sells drugs, gets caught, to receive the death penalty for their heinous acts,” he added.

While it remains unclear how Trump would act to expand the death penalty, anti-death penalty groups and criminal justice reform advocates say they are taking his claims seriously, noting the spree of federal executions that occurred during his first term.

“We’re going to fight this tooth and nail, and we’re going to seek to uphold the constitutional principals that do not call for this expansion,” said Yasmin Cader, an ACLU deputy legal director and the director of its Trone Center for Justice and Equality.

At the tail end of Trump’s first term, 13 federal inmates were put to death — even as the pandemic led states to halt executions because of Covid concerns in prisons. The cases included the first woman executed by the federal government in nearly 70 years; the youngest person based on the age when the crime occurred (18 at the time of his arrest); and the only Native American on federal death row.

No president had overseen as many federal executions since Grover Cleveland in the late 1800s, and the U.S. government had not executed anyone for more than 15 years until Trump revived the practice.

His then-attorney general, William Barr, had said that the federal government “owed it to victims to carry out the sentence imposed by the justice system.”

To read more CLICK HERE

Mangino discusses Trump's charges after election

Watch my interview with Lindsay McCoy on WFMJ-TV examining the future of criminal charges against President-elect Donald Trump.

To watch CLICK HERE

Monday, November 11, 2024

Can special counsel Jack Smith actually be prosecuted?

House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) and Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-Georgia) asked Jack Smith’s office to preserve all records of the historic classified document and election interference probes, a routine first step in congressional inquiries, law enforcement investigations and litigation, reported, reported the Washington Post.

Smith’s team included veteran national security prosecutors who had spent years at the Justice Department. They secured grand jury indictments charging Doanld Trump with hoarding classified documents after leaving the White House and obstructing government efforts to retrieve them, and illegally trying to overturn Biden’s 2020 election victory.

Since this week’s election, Smith has signaled that he plans to wind down the cases against Trump and focus on completing a final report to Attorney General Merrick Garland, rather than pushing ahead with the prosecutions until the inauguration and forcing a confrontation with the incoming administration.

Smith is assessing how he wants to proceed with the case now that Trump is expected to be sworn in as president on Jan. 20, the special counsel and his team told a federal judge in a filing Friday. Justice Department policy would not allow for the prosecution of a sitting president. U.S. District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan responded by granting Smith’s request to suspend all remaining deadlines in the case Friday.

Jordan and Loudermilk’s letter to Smith suggested that Smith’s office might respond to the election by purging records, warning, “The Office of Special Counsel is not immune from transparency or above accountability for its actions.” The lawmakers, both staunch Trump supporters, repeated an earlier request for Smith to turn over records about his communications with Garland, his hiring decisions and the court-approved search of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in August 2022.

In its filing to Chutkan on Friday, Smith’s team said it needed to assess how to proceed with the case, which accused Trump of trying to interfere with the 2020 election results, now that he is returning to the White House.

Chutkan quickly granted that request and ordered prosecutors to file a report by Dec. 2 explaining how they want to proceed.

The case is still far from a potential trial, and Chutkan is determining what allegations in the superseding indictment may still be prosecuted after the Supreme Court ruled this summer that presidents enjoy broad immunity.

Smith’s options include preparing a final report for public disclosure or dismissing both cases so that they can be revived after Trump’s second term ends, said Barbara McQuade, a law professor at the University of Michigan and a former federal prosecutor.

If he terminates the criminal cases soon enough, Smith could deliver a final report detailing the findings of his two probes to Garland before Trump becomes the next president. A final report would allow Smith to “share with the public his evidence of Trump’s crimes,” McQuade said. “Members of Congress should be careful what they ask for.”

Smith could then resign as special counsel before Trump has a chance to make good on his promises to fire him.

Garland has previously said that he would make special counsel reports public if they reached his desk, though he has not indicated specifically what he would do if Smith gave him such a report now.

Were Smith to press forward into a Trump administration, the president or his attorney general could fire him and order the Justice Department to drop the prosecution.

To read more CLICK HERE 

Sunday, November 10, 2024

White supremacist plotted to destroy Tennessee electricity substation

A white supremacist is accused of trying to destroy an electricity substation in Tennessee in an attempt to bring down the regional power network and disrupt American society, authorities told NBC News.

Skyler Philippi, 24, of Columbia, Tennessee, was arrested after an FBI investigation found that he planned to attach a bomb to a drone and fly it into the energy facility in Nashville as part of his extremist agenda, authorities said.

Philippi is charged with the attempted use of a weapon of mass destruction and the attempted destruction of an energy facility. He appeared in court last week and is due to appear again on Nov. 13. He remains in custody and faces possible life in prison.

In messages to FBI sources, Philippi espoused accelerationist views, a theory popular among far-right extremists that is predicated on large shocks causing chaos and forcing society to change its racial make-up, resulting in a white-only state, authorities said.

The theory was popularized by manifestos left by perpetrators in a number of high-profile neo-Nazi and white supremacist terrorist incidents, including the killing of 51 people at two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand, in 2019.

The suspect allegedly told a confidential FBI source in June that he wanted to carry out a mass shooting at a YMCA facility in Columbia, south of Nashville, but later in the year decided that this wouldn’t be enough to achieve.

"If you want to do the most damage as an accelerationist, attack high economic, high tax, political zones in every major metropolis," Philippi wrote, according to court documents released Monday.

In September, Philippi showed an undercover agent portions of his manifesto, which said that "radical armed struggle is the only end to protecting and preserving our folk."

To read more CLICK HERE

Saturday, November 9, 2024

Bail reform fails in Baltimore--people in jail awaiting trial increases

Seven years after Maryland tried to reform the cash bail system because of its disproportionate impact on the state’s poorest residents, people who get arrested in Baltimore are being held in jail before trial at a higher rate than before the change, reported the Baltimore Beat.

While the use of cash bail has dropped since the bail reform effort, nearly two-thirds of all initial appearances in Baltimore — the first hearing an arrested person has before a court official — now end in a bail denial, a rate that has surged by about 300% since the state judiciary changed the rules surrounding pretrial release in 2017.

The population at Baltimore’s main pretrial detention center has actually risen since 2017, even as arrests have declined during the same period. People who are held in jail before trial can wait months or longer before their case concludes, even though they are presumed innocent and criminal cases in Baltimore often end without a conviction.

The biggest shift since the rule change has come from court officers denying bail entirely, according to data provided by the state judiciary and analyzed by Baltimore Beat and The Garrison Project.

The data shows: 

·         Since the bail reform rule change in 2017, the use of cash bail at initial appearances has fallen dramatically in Baltimore, from about 40% before the 2017 effort to under 5% in the first half of 2023, the most recent data provided by the state judiciary.

·         Baltimore’s overall release rate — the proportion of people freed on unsecured bond or on their own recognizance at their initial appearances — rose at first after bail reform, but then fell back below pre-reform levels.

·         In 2016, court officers in Baltimore held people without bail at their initial appearances less than 15% of the time, but bail denials quickly spiked after the rule change and have hovered around 60% since 2020.

These are not brief stints in jail. More than 60% of defendants who have an initial appearance are still in custody five days later.

The 2017 bail reform effort was designed to reduce the crushing, unequal costs of cash bail and stop judges from holding people in jail pretrial simply because they could not afford to pay — a practice that was likely unconstitutional, the Maryland Attorney General’s Office said in 2016.

Yet the population at Baltimore’s main pretrial detention center has risen from under 700 people per day on average in 2017 to more than 900 in 2023. The facility’s health care system is under intense scrutiny, and at least four people have died in pretrial custody this year, including a man who was held on $3,500 cash bail after being accused of stealing snacks from a vending machine.

Christopher Dews, a lobbyist who represents Out for Justice, a nonprofit that supports formerly incarcerated people, said the difference after the 2017 rule change was clear when he worked on the Job Opportunity Task Force’s bail fund in Baltimore. The number of people eligible to be bailed out of jail dwindled and then reached zero, he said.

The result has frustrated reform advocates who considered the rule change a victory but have since watched it backfire.

“It is quite painful, the reality that whenever we have a massive policy win for equitable criminal justice reforms, it does seem as if the state finds non-legislative, non-policy ways to thwart those successes,” Dews said. “As advocates, we prepare to defend our wins, but you can only defend wins so much from the state that has to implement those same wins.”

The pretrial system became more black-and-white after the rule change, added Nicole Belle, who was a case manager for the Job Opportunity Task Force’s bail fund from 2021 until early 2023. People facing charges were either released or held without bail.

“There was no in between,” Belle said.  

To read more CLICK HERE

Friday, November 8, 2024

Mangino discusses Kohberger case and the death penalty on TMZ

Watch my interview with Harvey Levin on TMZ to discuss defense motions seeking to take the death penalty off the table in the Bryan Kohberger quadruple murder case.


To watch the interview CLICK HERE

Thursday, November 7, 2024

Mangino discusses foster mother's guilty plea to murder of foster child on Law & Crime Network

Watch my interview with Elizabeth Millner of the Law & Crime Network discussing the guilty plea of a 340 lbs foster mother who sat on her 90 lbs foster son causing his death.

To watch the interview CLICK HERE

Wednesday, November 6, 2024

Mangino discusses death penalty for Bryan Kohberger on FOX News

Great to join Michael Ruiz on Fox News to discuss Idaho's plan to seek the death penalty for Bryan Kohberger in the murder of four University of Idaho students.

To watch CLICK HERE


Tuesday, November 5, 2024

VOTE!

Today is Election Day, time to vote in the most consequential election of our lifetime!


Monday, November 4, 2024

Trump’s 'evidence-free rhetoric' on crime was intended to deceive voters

Her is an excerpt from Ashley Rubin, a social scientist at the University of Hawaii, recent article posted on Radley Balko’s The Watch: 

Donald Trump’s evidence-free rhetoric [on crime] has managed to convince his supporters that violent crime is a major problem. A recent Gallup poll found that three of the five most important issues according to Republican and Republican-leaning independent voters—crime, immigration, and terrorism and national security—are connected to the broader issue of crime. But it’s not just Trump’s supporters—voters in general now care more about crime, even as the crime rates are falling and remain low, historically speaking.

As sociologist Katherine Beckett has demonstrated, the more politicians talk about crime, the more the media talks about crime, and the more citizens become concerned about crime—even when actual crime rates show crime is not the problem citizens think it is.

Trump’s promise to “stop crime and restore safety” sounds good to those voters who believe the hype that violent crime is at historically high levels (it’s not) and that we are in the middle of a crime wave (we’re not), and who believe that Harris plans to gut police departments in order to let violent criminals run free (she doesn’t). The effect is that those who challenge Trump’s depiction of a dangerous America get characterized as being soft on crime or enabling criminality.

Ultimately, by convincing the public that crime is a real threat, Trump isn’t just trying to delegitimize his opponents. He’s also paving the way for the public to accept unnecessary and harmful policy changes that don’t meaningfully bring the crime rate down but help him purge society—whether through deportation or incarceration—of the people he believes shouldn’t be in it.

To read more CLICK HERE