American emergency rooms treat at least one firearm injury every 30 minutes

The COVID-19 pandemic and its corresponding increase in shootings sparked a national conversation around firearm injury, emergency room visits, and the treatment of gun violence victims in hospitals. Five years later, the conversation has faded, but new data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention shows that gun violence remains a stubborn presence across the country, with 93,022 shooting injuries treated in hospitals from 2018 to 2023. 

According to the research, an American emergency room treats at least one firearm injury every 30 minutes, reported The Trace.

“Most cities use police data to inform prevention planning, but data from hospital and public health sources is an essential, and often missing, piece to guide action, as many incidents of violence and crime are not reported to police,” said Dr. Adam Rowh, a medical epidemiologist at the CDC and lead author of the study, via e-mail to The Trace.

The study, published in Annals of Internal Medicine last month, analyzed the CDC’s data on emergency department firearm injuries, which is limited to the District of Columbia and nine states: Florida, Georgia, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, Utah, Virginia, Washington, and West Virginia. The study showed that the monthly rates for shooting injuries were highest in July and lowest in February; daily rates were disproportionately high on holidays, and nighttime peaks were the highest on Friday and Saturday, consistent with prior research. The researchers also found that rates were highest between 2:30 and 3:00 a.m., and were the lowest between 10:00 and 10:30 a.m. 

The authors of the study concluded that knowing the periods when gunshot injuries are highest could be essential both in deploying care and in effectively allocating resources, such as trauma preparedness, ambulance services, hospital staffing, and strategies for intervention. 

One of those strategies is hospital-based violence intervention programs (HVIPs), an effort aimed at mitigating reinjury by providing holistic and rehabilitative care to shooting victims. The model, first developed 30 years ago, has spread nationwide, and various programs fund their services through myriad resources, most notably through grants now facing the threat of cuts and closures. 

“It’s happening on every front,” January Serda, the grant coordinator of one such program in Newport News, Virginia, said of federal cuts to community violence intervention funding, education, and healthcare.

Dr. Randi Smith, a trauma surgeon who launched an HVIP at Grady Memorial Hospital, in Atlanta, Georgia, said she has attended to a gunshot victim on every one of her on-call days in the trauma center. Financial and social investment in such programs is as paramount to treatment as life-saving medical care, she emphasized. 

“I was very motivated to start a violence intervention program, taking best practices from some of the programs that I have been a part of and shortcomings that I had learned from the past,” Smith said. The program she started in 2023, Interrupting Violence Among Youth and Young Adults, is one of the few based in the Southeast. 

The program has served more than a thousand people, including survivors and their family members. According to Smith, its reinjury rates are less than 3 percent, compared with national benchmarks that are up to 30 percent and institutional benchmarks that are between 12 and 15 percent. 

Her work has a long legacy. Nearly four decades ago, physicians and nurses —  especially those with public health experience — were among the first cohort of medical practitioners to recognize gun violence as a public health issue. That recognition was largely based on what they witnessed in hospitals and emergency rooms, as the rate of shootings reached historic highs in the 1980s and ‘90s. Those firsthand accounts were pivotal in the development of the nation’s first hospital-based violence intervention programs.

Serda, the grant coordinator for an HVIP in Virginia, said in today’s multilayered crisis, it’s more paramount than ever to prioritize care for the people on the frontlines. She came to violence intervention from nonprofit management and fundraising for survivors of sexual assault in 2022, after her 17-year-old son, Justice Dunham, was fatally shot in a high school parking lot after a basketball game.

“I was blown away by the lack of training around trauma-informed care, or safe spaces and outlets, for nurses and practitioners, and people who are seeing this firsthand and helping the community,” said Serda, who began to advocate for trauma-informed initiatives designed to help patients, her HVIP team and others address the emotional impact of caring for victims of violence and firearm injuries. “There was no discussion about compassion fatigue, or burnout, or vicarious trauma.”

As hospital personnel adjust to the ever-evolving firearm violence crisis, Smith said listening to their experiences, and supporting their well-being, has never been more crucial. 

“I think a lot of people are looking at the recent news, post-pandemic, that shootings have decreased, and have not realized that we as hospital staff are still treating patients day after day,” said Smith, “dealing with a medical environment that shifted significantly since the pandemic, and navigating extreme burnout.”

To read more CLICK HERE

Creators: The US Supreme Court Takes up Ghost Guns

Matthew T. Mangino
Creators Syndicate
October 8, 2024

The U.S. Supreme Court opened its new term this week with a near-record-low approval rating of 43%, according to a recent Gallup poll.

The new term promises to be closely followed with a number of politically charged cases, including another gun rights case. Last term, the Supreme Court struck down the federal ban on bump stocks in a 6-3 decision. Bump stocks are so-called conversion devices for semiautomatic AR-style rifles — allowing a rifle to fire like a machine gun.

This term, the justices will hear arguments on the regulation of ghost guns. The untraceable guns are assembled without serial numbers. Ghost gun kits can be bought online without presenting identification or undergoing the background check required by federally licensed dealers. The gun kits can be purchased anonymously through a variety of methods commonly used online.

Under federal law, gun manufacturers and dealers have to obtain a federal license, keep records of gun sales and transfers, conduct background checks, and in the case of manufacturers, stamp the firearms with serial numbers. Law enforcement officials use those serial numbers to track guns used in crimes.

The problem for the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) was that these rules don't apply uniformly to homemade guns, which have become increasingly popular.

Between 2016 to 2022, ATF agents saw a tenfold increase in reports of ghost guns. In fact, 14,000 suspected ghost guns were recovered by law enforcement and reported to the ATF in just five months last year, according to the Justice Department.

Not to mention, firearm violence generally is a public health tragedy. According to Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 48,204 people died by firearms in the United States in 2022 — an average of one death every 11 minutes.

In 2022, in an effort to deal with ghost guns, the ATF implemented a rule amending the definition of a "firearm" to include certain weapon components that "may be readily converted into firearms," as well as certain partially complete, disassembled or nonfunctional frames or receivers.

According to the Constitutional Accountability Center, an organization that filed a "friend of the court" brief in the matter before the Supreme Court, "The ATF's rule is consistent with the plain text of the GCA (Gun Control Act of 1968)."

According to the CAC, the ordinary meaning of the GCA's phrase "may be readily converted" indisputably covers the kits and devices specified in ATF's rule, which "may be readily converted" into fully functional firearms.

The CAC argues that when an "amateur working at home transforms a weapons parts kit into a finished state with fairly quick efficiency, that person 'readily ... convert[s]' the kit into a weapon that 'expel[s] a projectile by the action of an explosive' within the meaning of the GCA."

The rule's challengers have argued that the changes made by ATF are "inconsistent" with the definition of a firearm, according to NBC News. "An incomplete collection of parts isn't a weapon," they argued in their brief to the Supreme Court, and it's up to Congress, not the ATF, to decide whether privately made guns should be regulated.

The question is whether a majority of this Supreme Court — which often, as we saw last year, takes an expansive view of gun rights — will sign onto this attempt to evade background checks and serial numbers for ghost guns.

In 2023, in a surprising alignment of justices, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined the court's three Democratic appointees in issuing a temporary order to leave the status quo — the background check and serial number requirements — until the high court resolves the ghost gun issue.

The Supreme Court will hear arguments on the ATF rule on Tuesday, Oct. 8, 2024.

Matthew T. Mangino is of counsel with Luxenberg, Garbett, Kelly & George P.C. His book "The Executioner's Toll, 2010" was released by McFarland Publishing. You can reach him at www.mattmangino.com and follow him on X @MatthewTMangino.

To visit Creators CLICK HERE