Pittsburgh area police FB forum spews hostility and intimidation

In a private Facebook group called the Pittsburgh Area Police Breakroom, many current and retired officers spent the year criticizing chiefs who took a knee or officers who marched with Black Lives Matter protesters, whom they called “terrorists” or “thugs,” reported The Associated Press. They made transphobic posts and bullied members who supported anti-police brutality protesters or Joe Biden in a forum billed as a place officers can “decompress, rant, share ideas.”

Many of the deluge of daily posts were jokes about the hardships of being officers, memorials to deceased colleagues or conversations about training and equipment. But over the group’s almost four-year existence, a few dozen members became more vocal with posts that shifted toward pro-Donald Trump memes and harsh criticism of anyone perceived to support so-called “demoncrats,” Black Lives Matter or coronavirus safety measures.

In June, Tim Huschak, a corporal at the Borough of Lincoln Police Department, posted a screenshot of an Allegheny County 911 dispatcher’s Facebook page indicating that the phrase “Blue Lives Matter” used by law enforcement supporters is not equivalent to the slogan “Black Lives Matter” because policing is a choice, not a fact of birth. He wrote:

“Many negative posts on police. And we should trust her with our lives???”

Some angry members rallied quickly and organized phone calls to her supervisor demanding she be fired.

“Multiple officers should call and report it. Remember NO JUSTICE NO PEACE LOL,” West Mifflin Borough Police Department officer Tommy Trieu responded under his Facebook name, Tommy Bear.

Trieu was one of two West Mifflin officers seen in a video last year restraining a 15-year-old Black girl after responding to a call about a fight on a school bus. Activists called for firing the officers, but borough officials said the recording started after a student hit an officer and that they “did nothing wrong.”

A few members of the group also were bullied or left the page, including an officer who said the Fraternal Order of Police’s Trump endorsement did not represent her and a Black officer who was accused of creating a fake Facebook account to complain about the lack of diversity in local departments.

The Associated Press was able to view posts and comments from the group, which has 2,200 members, including about a dozen current and former police chiefs -- from mainly Allegheny County and some surrounding areas stretching into Ohio -- and at least one judge and one councilman. After the AP began asking about posts last week, the group appeared to have been deleted or suspended from view.

To read more CLICK HERE

 

Guest Column: State should act on cyberbullying

Matthew T. Mangino
The Delaware County Daily Times
September 23, 2013

Recently, the dark side of social media made headlines across the country as authorities investigated the role of cyberbullying in the suicide of Rebecca Ann Sedwick, a 12-year-old Florida girl who jumped to her death from an abandoned cement plant near her home.

Friends and family said she suffered constant online harassment from friends who had savagely turned against her in a dispute over a boyfriend.

We are constantly reminded that bullying is no longer hurtful words exchanged between students in hallways and bathrooms and by notes passed in classrooms.

About 20 percent of young people have been the victim of cyberbullying, according to the Cyberbullying Research Center, a clearinghouse of information on cyberbullying. About 15 percent of teens have admitted they have bullied or ridiculed others on social media, photo-sharing and other websites, reported the Los Angeles Times.

According to the website of Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane cyberbullying can include, but is not limited to:

Sending cruel, vicious or threatening e-mails.

Creating Web sites that have stories, pictures and jokes ridiculing others.

Posting pictures of other students/kids online with derogatory phrases or questions attached to them.

Using someone else’s e-mail to send vicious or incriminating e-mails to others.

Using instant messaging tools to harass others.

The law in Pennsylvania currently imposes criminal liability for engaging in a course of conduct that causes emotional distress by electronic means including electronic mail, Internet and wireless communication.

Pennsylvania law also provides that schools must adopt a policy on the use of electronic communication with intent to bully in a school setting. The policy is limited—“school setting” is defined as in school, on school grounds, in school vehicles, at bus stops and during school activities.

When the Pennsylvania House of Representatives reconvenes in Harrisburg for the fall session, proposals to deal with cyberbullying will be one of the issues that legislators address.

House Bill 156, also known as the Pennsylvania Safe Schools or PASS ACT, would require clearer definitions of bullying and cyberbullying, provide prevention and remediation tools for all teachers and school staff on incidents of bullying, establish reporting requirements and allow for parents and the community to support the adoption of anti-bullying policies.

House Bill 1163 would make cyber harassment of a child a punishable offense. This legislation would prohibit the use of electronic communications to repeatedly make statements or offer opinions about a child’s sexuality or sexual activity or make statements that significantly ridicule, demean or cause serious embarrassment to a child.

“The consequences can be, we found, very devastating to a child. In fact, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has characterized cyberbullying as an emergency public health problem.

Not everyone is behind the crusade to eradicate cyberbullying, reported WHYY. The Pennsylvania chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union opposes the legislation, saying it is not constitutional to censor free speech online just because it is mean-spirited and directed at a child.

However, Audrey Rogers, a professor at Pace Law School, told USA Today words can be criminal. “You’re not allowed to use your words to harass, annoy or intimidate someone,” she said. “It’s clear the law allows you to outlaw certain kinds of speech.”

The courts are a mixed bag in Pennsylvania. In J.S. v. Bethlehem Area School District, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that “where speech that is aimed at a specific school and/or its personnel is brought onto the school campus or accessed at school by its originator, the speech will be considered on-campus speech.”

The U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals said the school generally “cannot punish a student for expressive conduct that originated outside of the schoolhouse.”

These cases leave unclear the right of school officials to regulate or discipline conduct on social media that has a negative influence on the school environment.

Matthew T. Mangino is of counsel with Luxenberg, Garbett, Kelly and George. P.C. and the former district attorney for Lawrence County, Pa. You can read his blog every day at www.delcotimes.com and follow him on twitter @MatthewTMangino.

Visit the Delco Times

The Cautionary Instruction: PA lawmakers to take up cyberbullying

Matthew T. Mangino
The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette/Ipso Facto
September 20, 2013

Authorities are investigating the role of cyberbullying in the suicide last week of Rebecca Ann Sedwick, a 12-year-old Florida girl who jumped to her death from a platform at an abandoned cement plant near her home.

Friends and family said she suffered constant online harassment from friends who had turned against her in a dispute over a boy. Rebecca was "absolutely terrorized on social media," Polk County Sheriff Grady Judd told reporters.

Gone are the days when spiteful words and banter between students was traded in middle-school bathroom stalls and by notes passed in the hallways.

About 20 percent of young people have been the victim of cyberbullying, according to the Cyberbullying Research Center, a clearinghouse of information on cyberbullying. About 15 percent of teens have admitted they have bullied or ridiculed others on social media, photo-sharing and other websites.

"It's now 24-7. It's not just something you can escape after the school day," said Sameer Hinduja, co-director of the Cyberbullying Research Center.

Cyberbullying can include, but is not limited to:

-- Sending cruel, vicious or threatening e-mails.
-- Creating Web sites that have stories, pictures and jokes ridiculing others.
-- Posting pictures of other students/kids online with derogatory phrases or questions attached to them.
-- Using someone else's e-mail to send vicious or incriminating e-mails to others.
-- Using instant messaging tools to harass others.

 

When the Pennsylvania House of Representatives reconvenes in Harrisburg for the fall session, a proposal on cyberbullying will be one of the issues that legislators address.

"The consequences can be ... very devastating to a child. In fact, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has characterized cyberbullying as an emergency public health problem," said State Representative Ron Marsico.

At a recent hearing, the Pennsylvania District Attorneys Association voiced support for the plan, but said it should be changed to ensure that anyone prosecuted under it must be shown to have a malicious intent.

Every state but Montana has an anti-bullying law. However, only 18 states actually have laws that mention cyberbullying.

Not everyone is behind the crusade to eradicate cyberbullying. The Pennsylvania chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union opposes the legislation, saying it isn’t constitutional to censor free speech online just because it is mean-spirited and directed at a child.

However, Audrey Rogers, a professor at Pace Law School says words can be criminal. "You're not allowed to use your words to harass, annoy or intimidate someone," she said. "It's clear the law allows you to outlaw certain kinds of speech."

Visit Ipso Facto