Goldstein claims that Whitaker was illegally installed as
the temporary successor of former attorney general Jeff Sessions, and that
Rosenstein is the legal and constitutional successor to Sessions. The motion
argues that as the Senate-confirmed Deputy Attorney General, Rosenstein
automatically succeeded to the role of Acting Attorney General under 28
USC § 508(a) and the Appointments Clause in Article II of the
Constitution.
The motion calls for the court to resolve this dispute
immediately. The Attorney General has a number of responsibilities, including
appointing immigration judges, determining whether to enforce federal statutes
and overseeing the investigation of Special Counsel Robert Mueller.
If the court does not resolve this dispute immediately, then
decides later that Whitaker’s appointment was always invalid, then unwinding
all of Whitaker’s orders would be “a fraught and disruptive exercise,”
Goldstein argues
There is no deadline for action by the judges.
To visit Jurist CLICK HERE
No comments:
Post a Comment