The U.S. Supreme Court will soon consider whether to hear
the Texas case of Duane Buck, who was sentenced to die in 1997 for shooting his
ex-girlfriend Debra Gardner and her friend Kenneth Butler, reported the The Marshall Project.
His small army of advocates don’t
dispute his guilt but argue he is facing the harshest possible punishment
primarily “because
he is black.”
At his trial, Walter Quijano, a psychologist called by the
defense, told jurors that Buck was more likely to commit a violent crime again
because of his race. (Death sentences in Texas require that a defendant be
judged a “continuing threat to society.”) Quijano later told
The Texas Tribune he was describing a statistical relationship, and
not a causal connection between race and violence, but Buck’s lawyers say his comments
tainted the jury’s decision.
Many historians (including David Oshinsky last week in the Wall
Street Journal) see the contemporary death penalty as the latest stage
in a history that stretches back to lynchings, pointing out that most
executions continue to take place in the states of the former Confederacy.
“We’ve used the death penalty to sustain racial hierarchy by making it primarily
a tool to reinforce the victimization of white people,” the lawyer Bryan
Stevenson told
The Marshall Project last year. Rachel Aviv’s New Yorker
story on the Louisiana case of Rodricus Crawford made prominent
mention of the Confederate flag inscribed on a stone slab outside the
courthouse during his trial.
To read more CLICK HERE
No comments:
Post a Comment