The growth in the nation’s prison population has been
nothing short of staggering. The United States’ incarceration rate is now more
than four times the world average, with about 2.2 million people in prisons and
jails. Of those, roughly 200,000 are federal inmates, double the number from 20
years ago. This substantial increase occurred even as violent crime was falling
sharply.
Now Congress is considering bipartisan legislation to loosen
tough sentencing laws. The bill faces resistance from some lawmakers, wrote Jason Furman and Douglas Holtz-Eakin in the New York Times.
As economists who differ on many issues, we both agree that
cost-benefit analysis provides a useful framework for analyzing complicated
questions. And in this case, we agree that the verdict of such analysis is
clear: Our sentencing rules are failing and need to be changed.
A general rule in economics — the law of diminishing
marginal benefits — applies to incarcerating additional people or adding years
to sentences. Research finds that more incarceration has, at best, only a small
effect on crime because our incarceration rate is already so high. As the
prison population gets larger, the additional prisoner is more likely to be a
less risky, nonviolent offender, and the value of incarcerating him (or, less
likely, her) is low.
The same general principle applies to the length of prison
sentences, which in many cases have gotten longer as a result of sentence
enhancements, repeat-offender laws, “three strikes” laws and
“truth-in-sentencing” laws. Longer sentences do not appear to have a deterrent
effect; one study finds, for example, that the threat of longer sentences has
little impact on juvenile arrest rates. Other studies have found that
sentencing enhancements have only modest effects on crime. They are unlikely to
meaningfully affect the overall crime rate or generate meaningful gains in
public safety.
Moreover, in many cases the analysis suggests that adding
prisoners or years to sentences can be harmful. A growing body of research
shows that incarceration and longer sentences could increase recidivism.
Individuals may build criminal ties while incarcerated, lose their labor-market
skills and confront substantial obstacles to re-entry after release. A new
study finds that each additional year of incarceration increases the likelihood
of re-offending by four to seven percentage points after release.
The bottom line: The putative benefits of more incarceration
or longer sentences are actually costs.
To read more CLICK HERE
No comments:
Post a Comment