The term “superpredator” has been around for 25 years. It made a resurgence during the 2020 presidential debates, but the reality is that much of the harsh anti-crime legislation embraced by both parties in the 1990s continues to be a hot-button issue to this day, reported The Marshall Project.
From the moment the term was born, “superpredator”
had a game-changing potency, derived in part from the avalanche of media
coverage that began almost immediately.
“It was a
word that was constantly in my orbit,” said Steve Drizin, a Chicago lawyer who
defended teenagers in the 1990s. “It had a profound effect on the way in which
judges and prosecutors viewed my clients.”
An academic named John J. DiIulio Jr. coined the
term for a November 1995 cover story in The Weekly Standard, a brand-new
magazine of conservative political opinion that hit pay dirt with the
provocative coverline, “The
Coming of the Super-Predators.”
Then a young professor at Princeton University,
DiIulio was extrapolating from a study of Philadelphia boys that calculated
that 6 percent of them accounted for more than half the serious crimes
committed by the whole cohort. He blamed these chronic offenders on “moral
poverty … the poverty of being without loving, capable, responsible adults who
teach you right from wrong.”
DiIulio warned that by the year 2000 an additional
30,000 young “murderers, rapists, and muggers” would be roaming America’s
streets, sowing mayhem. “They place zero value on the lives of their victims,
whom they reflexively dehumanize as just so much worthless ‘white trash,’"
he wrote.
But who was doing the dehumanizing? Just a few years
before, the news media had introduced the terms “wilding” and “wolf pack” to
the national vocabulary, to describe five teenagers—four Black and one
Hispanic—who were convicted and later exonerated of the rape of a woman in New
York’s Central Park.
“This kind of animal imagery was already in the
conversation,” said Kim Taylor-Thompson, a law professor at New York
University. “The superpredator language began a process of allowing us to
suspend our feelings of empathy towards young people of color.”
The “superpredator” theory, besides being a racist
trope, was not borne out in crime statistics. Juvenile arrests for murder—and
juvenile crime generally—had already started falling when DiIulio’s article was
published. By 2000, when tens of thousands more children were supposed to be
out there mugging and killing, juvenile murder arrests had fallen by
two-thirds.
It failed as a theory, but as fodder for editorials,
columns and magazine features, the term “superpredator” was a tragic
success—with an enormous, and lasting, human toll.
To read more CLICK HERE
No comments:
Post a Comment