As our homes keep getting smarter: law enforcement
will treat your appliances as potential witnesses.
It seems new smart gadgets are introduced every
week, reported The Marshall Project. There are smart TVs, which suggest the programs they think you’ll like.
Smart refrigerators are equipped with interior cameras and UPC scanners that
keep track of the items you stock in your refrigerator, and then reorder them
as they run out. One brand of smart mattress “tracks over 15 factors about your
sleep and health, including deep sleep, heart rate and respiratory rate,”
according to its website.
“From a law enforcement or intelligence perspective,
these are very valuable tools that can let them monitor or listen to
individuals,” says Dale Watson, the FBI’s former executive assistant director,
now a consultant.
“Smart devices are also kind of frightening,” Watson
says. “What are the legal ramifications? The technology is moving so fast that
the laws and courts haven’t caught up with it.”
One reason there aren’t clear legal guidelines has
to do with the way smart homes work, which, some analysts contend, means
they’re not protected by the Fourth Amendment. “The right of the people to be
secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable
searches and seizures, shall not be violated,” the Amendment declares. Courts
have ruled that means police can’t search your home, except in emergencies,
without convincing a judge to sign a search warrant on the grounds that there’s
“probable cause” they will find evidence of a crime.
But the Supreme Court and other courts have
established a broad exception, called the “third party doctrine.” The
government does not need a search warrant in most cases to get personal
information that you’ve already shared voluntarily with somebody else, like a
bank or internet provider or utility.
Well, smart devices in your home are constantly
sharing your personal information with somebody else. This “internet
of things” sends details about your food orders and sleep cycles and
conversations with Alexa through your router and over the internet, usually to
the manufacturer or a contractor. So some government officials argue that the
third party doctrine applies and they can get that information just by asking
for it. When “third party” companies balk, police in some states get the
information by issuing a subpoena, no judge’s approval needed.
For instance, San Diego Gas & Electric Company
disclosed recently that government agencies subpoenaed data generated by smart meters
at 480 homes and businesses last year. A company spokesperson would not
disclose which agencies, but the company has given meter data before to the FBI
and Immigration and Customs Enforcement, among others.
The Supreme Court hasn’t ruled yet on issues raised
specifically by smart homes, but it is about to decide another case that could
have a bearing on the issue. The question in Carpenter v. United States is, can
the government get historical cell phone location data from your phone company
without a warrant? If so, how far back into your history can it go? In
resolving those questions, the justices might hint how strictly they want to
protect other data generated by your smart meter and refrigerator.
as our homes keep getting smarter: law enforcement
will treat your appliances as potential witnesses.
It seems new smart gadgets are introduced every
week. There are smart TVs, which suggest the programs they think you’ll like.
Smart refrigerators are equipped with interior cameras and UPC scanners that keep
track of the items you stock in your refrigerator, and then reorder them as
they run out. One brand of smart mattress “tracks over 15 factors about your
sleep and health, including deep sleep, heart rate and respiratory rate,”
according to its website.
“From a law enforcement or intelligence perspective,
these are very valuable tools that can let them monitor or listen to
individuals,” says Dale Watson, the FBI’s former executive assistant director,
now a consultant.
To read more CLICK HERE
No comments:
Post a Comment