Senior White House adviser Jared Kushner recently hosted
a listening session for his father-in-law, President Donald Trump, on prison
reform, according to Newsweek. Marc Mauer of The Sentencing Project wrote, since taking office, Attorney General Jeff Sessions has promoted an
aggressive agenda of reversing the policies of the Obama years, including
reviving contracting with private prisons, urging federal prosecutors to seek
harsher prison terms and opposing sentencing reform. Moreover, Sessions hasn’t
missed an opportunity to stoke fears about rising violent crime rates during
2015 and 2016, and falsely attributes these spikes to immigrants.
Kushner’s initiative, while beneficial, offers little in the
way of substantial reform. To date, he has largely focused on prison re-entry
programming, providing services and supports for people coming home from
prison. The re-entry concept was initiated under President Bill Clinton,
received legislative support from President George W. Bush and has been
embraced by corrections leaders around the nation. But important as it is, it’s
only an after-the-fact response to crime and harsh sentencing.
Alternatively, a more significant step toward reducing
excessive punishments and restoring fairness has been the introduction of the
Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act, sponsored by conservative Judiciary
Chairman Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and leading liberal Senator Dick Durbin
(D-IL). The legislation would outlaw many of the mandatory drug sentencing
provisions that have imposed lengthy prison terms in cases of drug kingpins and
lower level offenses, alike. It would also restore a greater measure of
discretion to federal judges so that they can consider the individual
circumstances of each case rather than being forced to apply a
one-size-fits-all structure that does a disservice to all. Further, the act
would scale back some of the provisions of the notorious “three strikes and
you’re out” statutes that have imposed sentences of life without parole even
for a third drug offense.
Despite bipartisan support for sentencing reform in
Congress, the legislation has been held up in the Senate by a handful of
Republicans. After Senator Tom Cotton and then-Senator Jeff Sessions objected
to the bill in 2016, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell did not schedule
the bill for a floor vote despite its passage by the Senate Judiciary
Committee.
So where does that leave us today? More re-entry
programming, the kind Kushner is suggesting, would be welcome, but a sole focus
on that initiative reveals two grievous flaws.
First, the programming provisions being discussed on Capitol
Hill contain no funding allocation. Apparently, there is hope that faith-based
organizations will emerge to provide these services pro bono. Religious groups
can play a valuable role in ministering to people in prison, but it is
irresponsible to expect that volunteers will be capable of delivering
professional services, such as substance abuse treatment, that are so urgently
needed among the prison population.
Second, dropping the sentencing provisions of the
Grassley-Durbin legislation from the Trump administration’s reform
conversations guarantees that there will be no significant inroads made into
reversing mass incarceration. Thousands of federal drug defendants will be
sentenced to decades of incarceration and resources will be squandered that
could more effectively be directed to prevention and treatment initiatives.
Shamefully, the U.S. will continue to be a world leader in
locking up its citizens, a sad commentary on the goal of achieving liberty and
justice.
To read more CLICK HERE
To read more CLICK HERE
No comments:
Post a Comment