Oregon Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum on Friday filed a “friend of the court” brief in a U.S. Supreme Court case that has the potential to invalidate thousands of non-unanimous jury convictions, reported The Oregonian.
Although Rosenblum personally opposes the provision of the
Oregon Constitution that allows non-unanimous jury verdicts, she argued in the
amicus brief that the Supreme Court should not overrule a 1972 case called
Apodaca v. Oregon that upheld split jury decisions.
“A ruling in this case that the Sixth Amendment requires
unanimity in state prosecutions will overturn hundreds if not thousands of past
convictions, convictions that Oregon has a legitimate reliance interest in
maintaining,” Rosenblum wrote in the brief.
Oregon is the only state in the nation that still allows
convictions for crimes short of first-degree murder by non-unanimous juries.
Voters in Louisiana, the other state to most recently allow non-unanimous
convictions, voted in November 2018 to amend their state’s constitution to end
the practice.
Read Rosenblum’s brief here.
State lawmakers were poised to ask voters to end
non-unanimous jury verdicts in Oregon earlier this year but after the bill
unanimously passed the House, Senate Democrats allowed it to die
quietly in the final days of the legislative session. Democrats
including Rep. Jennifer Williamson, of Portland, cited the Louisiana Supreme
Court case, saying it would be difficult to campaign for a state constitutional
amendment at the same time the issue might be under consideration by the U.S.
Supreme Court.
The Louisiana case centers on a 10-2 verdict against oil rig
supply boat worker Evangelisto Ramos, who was convicted of second-degree murder
in the killing of Trenice Fedison. Ramos slit Fedison’s throat and stabbed her
seven times, then dumped her headfirst into a trashcan near her home the day
before Thanksgiving in 2014. No murder weapon was found, but DNA evidence
including semen linked Ramos to Fedison and the trash can where her partially
clothed body was found, The Times-Picayune reported.
In a news release Friday, Rosenblum made clear she would
like to end Oregon’s status as the only remaining state that allows
non-unanimous jury verdicts.
“I want it to be understood that I fully support repealing
Oregon’s non-unanimous jury rule, the origin of which has been linked to racism
and anti-Semitism,” Rosenblum said. “Requiring unanimous juries would ensure
fair representation, promote systemic accountability and legitimacy, and bring
Oregon in line with all 49 of our sister states. That is why I support
referring an Oregon constitutional amendment to voters that would change
Oregon’s law going forward.”
To read more CLICK HERE
No comments:
Post a Comment