In recent days, the Justice Department has declassified or disclosed sensitive materials related to each of these proceedings that, on the surface, have little to do with each other. Yet within hours, President Donald Trump had weaponized each to boost his reelection campaign, reported Politico.
The Justice Department under William Barr is
coordinating political activities with the White House in a way not seen since John
Mitchell and Watergate, say veteran prosecutors and other Washington insiders,
even in the 60-day period before an election when “political'' cases and
investigations used to be placed on hold to avoid the appearance of
partisanship.
We all know where John Mitchell ended up--prison.
“These actions are not typical,” said William Jeffress, a veteran defense lawyer who represented former President Richard Nixon after he left the White House. “Tradition is that politically sensitive actions by DOJ go dark at least 60 days before an election.”
Jeffress called the Justice Department’s unusual
press release last week regarding a handful of discarded military ballots in
Luzerne County — a crucial area of a crucial state that swung to Trump in 2016
— “particularly striking.”
“The attorney general is working hand in glove with
the White House and the Trump reelection campaign,” said Gene Rossi, a former
federal prosecutor from Virginia turned white collar defense lawyer. “We have
not seen that level of unseemly coordination since Attorney General John
Mitchell.”
Justice Department officials insist there is no
basis to suggest that politics have infected the work of the department. Still,
at the heart of these new disclosures is a common thread: They all support
narratives that Trump has been pushing in recent months and deploying against
his rival, Democratic nominee Joe Biden.
Democrats have increasingly sounded the alarm about how
they say the machinery of the federal government has been mobilized to back
Trump’s reelection. They also cite recent evidence that the Treasury Department
helped supply explosive information to Senate Republicans that was released
last week in a report about Biden’s son Hunter’s business relationships, along
with examples at other agencies that suggest Trump is successfully harnessing
the power of the state to serve his election needs.
But they’re most alarmed about what they say is a Justice Department effort to aid Trump politically.
For example, Trump has baselessly asserted a
widespread campaign of voter fraud that calls the legitimacy of the 2020
election into doubt — a claim that has been rejected by lawmakers of both
parties, intelligence officials and his own hand-picked FBI director. Yet on
Thursday, a U.S. attorney from Pennsylvania issued an unusual letter that revealed a newly opened investigation into a handful
of mishandled ballots in a Pennsylvania election office.
Though local officials have indicated the episode
was likely a technical error, the U.S. attorney, David Freed, revealed that the
affected ballots were cast for Trump — a detail that has become a fixture of
Trump public comments in the days since. Other media outlets reported that
Attorney General William Barr personally flagged the news to the president, who
proceeded to tease the discovery in a radio interview before it was publicly
announced.
To DOJ veterans, this disclosure was as egregious a
breach as any in Barr’s 17-month tenure.
“This is not something that the attorney general
should even be telling Trump or they should be announcing in any fashion,” said
Nick Akerman, who served as a prosecutor during the Watergate-era investigation
of Nixon.
The pattern so perturbed one current assistant U.S.
attorney — veteran Massachusetts-based prosecutor James Herbert — that he
issued a stinging broadside against Barr in the pages of the Boston Globe over
the weekend.
“While I am a federal prosecutor, I am writing to
express my own views, clearly not those of the department, on a matter that
should concern all citizens: the unprecedented politicization of the office of
the attorney general,” Herbert wrote, citing Barr’s handling of special counsel
Mueller’s report, his involvement in cases like Flynn’s and his echoing of
Trump’s baseless allegations about mail-in ballots. “The attorney general acts
as though his job is to serve only the political interests of Donald J. Trump.
This is a dangerous abuse of power.”
A Justice Department official rejected the
suggestion of any impropriety in revealing the ballot investigation. It was an
issue that local media had begun to chase, which the local U.S. attorney’s
office had discovered was likely to be the subject of news reports. Freed had
been considering a statement on the matter independently before Trump jumped to
the front of the line and disclosed the investigation during a Fox &
Friends Radio interview, this official said.
How did Trump know? The DOJ official said Barr,
aware of the local media buzz, had mentioned to the president that the
department was going to be examining the issue.
David Weinstein, a former assistant U.S. attorney in
Florida, said the disclosures related to the Pennsylvania ballots probe were “inappropriate,
both in their content and timing.”
“When I was an [assistant U.S. attorney], you would
never reveal anything about your ongoing investigation,” he said. “It could
compromise the investigation itself and potentially [impugn] the reputation of
any subjects of the investigation who never became targets.”
Regardless of DOJ’s intent, Trump has clearly sought
to exact political benefit from the disclosure, raising it in political
rallies, press conferences and other appearances over the weekend, to fuel his
continued claims of large-scale voter fraud.
“If you look at the ballots — you know, they found
ballots in a garbage can, and they had the name ‘Trump’ on them,” the president
told reporters Saturday evening. “They were cast for Trump, and they found them
in a garbage can.”
He reacted similarly after the FBI declassified —
and Barr delivered to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) on Thursday — new details about the creation of an anti-Trump dossier by
former British intelligence agent Christopher Steele, which was used by the FBI
in 2016 to obtain a warrant to surveil Carter Page a former Trump campaign aide
suspected of ties to Russia.
The disclosure from the FBI indicated that Steele’s
primary subsource for the dossier was once the subject of a counterintelligence
investigation as a possible Russian agent, a probe that was closed in 2011. The
existence of that investigation was noted by the Justice Department’s inspector
general in a redacted footnote from his scathing 2019 report describing abuses
and omissions by the FBI in obtaining the Page warrant.
Though the watchdog didn’t include the existence of
this probe among the many omissions he attributed to the FBI, Trump quickly
pointed to the now-public revelation as proof that he was targeted by a witch
hunt.
“Bill Barr
can go down as the greatest attorney general in the history of our country, or
he can go down as an average guy," he told Fox Business’s Maria Bartiromo
recently. "It depends on what’s going to happen."
To read more CLICK HERE
No comments:
Post a Comment