The adult “pleaded guilty to two counts of Indecent Assault
of a person less than thirteen years of age” in connection to “incidents. . .
that occurred sometime between 2005 and 2006,” when the adult was still a
juvenile.
In its decision, the Superior Court focused on a prior case
where the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania held that lifetime sex offender
registration requirements for juvenile sexual offenders were unconstitutional.
There were two main reasons for this holding. First, the court found that juvenile
sex offenders were less likely to offend again, which is “a fundamental
underpinning to the registration requirements.”
Second, the court looked to US Supreme Court precedent which
has “held that mandatory sentences of life imprisonment without the possibility
of parole for homicide defendants under 18 years of age at the time the crime
was committed [were] unconstitutional.” The reasoning was due to differences in
brain development between juveniles and adults, which the Supreme Court of
Pennsylvania applied in its holding.
Ultimately, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania found that
the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s holding in a previous case “should apply with
equal weight to juvenile adjudications as well as to defendants convicted as
adults for crimes committed as juveniles.”
To read more CLICK HERE
No comments:
Post a Comment