New research by Jennifer L. Dolec of the University of Virginia and Anita
Mukherjee of the University of Wisconsin explores the moral hazard of the overdose reversing drug Naloxone.
According to the abstract, the United States is experiencing an epidemic of opioid
abuse. In response, many states have increased access to Naloxone, a drug that
can save lives when administered during an overdose. However, Naloxone access
may unintentionally increase opioid abuse through two channels:
(1) saving the
lives of active drug users, who survive to continue abusing opioids, and
(2)
reducing the risk of death per use, thereby making riskier opioid use more
appealing.
By increasing the number of opioid abusers who need to fund their
drug purchases, Naloxone access laws may also increase theft. We exploit the
staggered timing of Naloxone access laws to estimate the total effects of these
laws. We find that broadening Naloxone access led to more opioid-related
emergency room visits and more opioid-related theft, with no reduction in
opioid-related mortality.
These effects are driven by urban areas and vary by
region. We find the most detrimental effects in the Midwest, including a 14%
increase in opioid-related mortality in that region. We also find suggestive
evidence that broadening Naloxone access increased the use of fentanyl, a
particularly potent opioid. While Naloxone has great potential as a
harm-reduction strategy, our analysis is consistent with the hypothesis that
broadening access to Naloxone encourages riskier behaviors with respect to
opioid abuse.
No comments:
Post a Comment