W. James Antle III wrote in The Week:
Some crimes are so heinous, there is no other just
punishment for them.
For an example, look no further than the trial of Dylann
Roof. Roof has confessed to murdering nine innocent Americans during a prayer
service at a historic black church in Charleston, South Carolina. He killed
them in cold blood while they prayed, in premeditated fashion, because of the
hatred burning in his heart.
Many of the common objections to the death penalty do not
apply in Roof's case. There is no doubt about his guilt. "I went to that
church in Charleston and I did it," he confessed with a laugh. "Did
you shoot them?" a law enforcement officer asked. "Yes," Roof
replied, laughing again.
Sentencing Roof to death would not illustrate structural
racism. Quite the opposite. It would enhance racial justice and signify
progress in a region of the country where the state did not always protect
African Americans from racist murderers. It would be a public affirmation that
black lives matter.
Wielding the noose infrequently makes its occasional uses a
more powerful statement of our society's intolerance of certain acts of evil
without allowing it to devalue life itself. Consider the countries that do not
normally have the death penalty but executed Nazi war criminals. Osama bin
Laden's death would have been an act of justice even if he could have been
apprehended peacefully.
Murder is a gruesome and barbaric business. Its perpetrators
deserve the ultimate punishment. But a society must try to balance its power
and right to impose that penalty with its need to avoid becoming an accomplice
to murder itself.
To read more CLICK HERE
No comments:
Post a Comment