A federal judge in California on Friday overturned the state’s three-decade-old ban on assault weapons, which he called a “failed experiment,” prompting a sharp retort from the state’s governor, reported The New York Times.
California prohibited the sale of assault weapons in 1989. The law was
challenged in a suit filed in 2019 against the state’s attorney general by
plaintiffs including James Miller, a California resident, and the San Diego
County Gun Owners, a political action committee.
The judge, Roger T. Benitez of the U.S. District
Court for the Southern District of California, wrote that sections of the
state’s penal code that defined assault weapons and restricted their use were
“hereby declared unconstitutional and shall be enjoined.”
But the judge said he had granted a 30-day stay of
the ruling at the request of Attorney General Rob Bonta, a move that would
allow Mr. Bonta to appeal it.
Judge Benitez wrote that the case was about “what
should be a muscular constitutional right and whether a state can force a gun
policy choice that impinges on that right with a 30-year-old failed
experiment.”
“It should be an easy question and answer,” Judge
Benitez, who was nominated by former President George W. Bush, continued.
“Government is not free to impose its own new policy choices on American
citizens where constitutional rights are concerned.”
The judge wrote that the firearms banned under the
state’s law were not “bazookas, howitzers or machine guns,” but rather “fairly
ordinary, popular, modern rifles.”
In a statement late Friday, Gov. Gavin Newsom called
the ruling “a direct threat to public safety and the lives of innocent
Californians.”
Mr. Newsom also criticized the opening lines of
Judge Benitez’s decision, in which he wrote that, like a Swiss Army
knife, the AR-15 assault rifle “is a perfect combination of home
defense weapon and homeland defense equipment.”
The AR-15 re-entered the American gun market in 2004
after the end of a federal assault weapons ban. It has a national following
among gun owners, but it has also been used in mass shootings and vilified by
its critics as a weapon of mass murder.
Mr. Newsom wrote that comparing the gun to a Swiss
Army knife “completely undermines the credibility of this decision and is a
slap in the face to the families who’ve lost loved ones to this weapon.”
In a separate statement, Mr. Bonta called Judge
Benitez’s decision “fundamentally flawed” and vowed to appeal it.
“There is no sound basis in law, fact or common
sense for equating assault rifles with Swiss Army knives — especially on Gun
Violence Awareness Day and after the recent shootings in our own California
communities,” he said.
To read more CLICK HERE
No comments:
Post a Comment