The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to decide whether an officer can enter a garage without a warrant when in pursuit of a misdemeanor suspect, reported the ABA Journal.
The high court granted
cert in the case of Arthur Lange, a California man who sought to
suppress evidence of alcohol on his breath that led an officer to charge him
with driving under the influence. The officer noticed the smell while in
Lange’s garage after following him home. The officer first noticed Lange
because he was playing loud music and occasionally honking his horn while
driving his station wagon.
The state contended that the officer could enter
Lange’s garage without a warrant because Lange failed to stop when the officer
activated his overhead lights, which is a misdemeanor offense.
The case involves the Fourth Amendment, which requires
police to obtain a warrant before entering a home, except in “exigent
circumstances,” according to the cert
petition. That kind of exigency may exist when a police officer is in “hot
pursuit” of a suspect, but it’s unclear when the exception applies.
The Supreme Court has twice upheld warrantless entries
by officers pursuing an armed robber and a drug dealer—both felons. But in a
case involving a traffic violation that carried no possibility of jail time,
the Supreme Court said a warrantless entry for such a minor offense “should
rarely be sanctioned.”
The ambiguity has created a circuit split. Some courts
hold that the pursuit of a misdemeanor suspect always qualifies as an exigent
circumstance. Others decide on a fact-specific, case-by-case basis.
The officer who followed Lange home did not activate
his siren or immediately turn on his overheard lights. When Lange opened his
garage door, the officer turned on his overhead lights. Instead of pulling
over, Lange drove into his garage, and the officer followed him on foot. As the
garage door was going down, the officer stuck his foot under the sensor to open
it back up.
In the garage, the office noticed the smell of alcohol
on Lange’s breath. Lange was charged with driving under the influence and
operating a vehicle sound system at excessive levels. Lange pleaded no contest
to the DUI in Sonoma County, California, after his suppression motion was
denied.
The case is Lange v. California.
To read more CLICK HERE
No comments:
Post a Comment