A little-noticed court filing unsealed this week as part of
special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s ongoing probe could have big
consequences for his other targets — showing he’s willing to use suspects’
lawyers to provide evidence against them, reported the Washington Post.
After unsealing a 12-count indictment against President Trump’s former campaign chairman,
Paul Manafort, the U.S. District Court also unsealed an opinion from Chief
Judge Beryl A. Howell saying one of Manafort’s former lawyers could be
compelled to testify to the grand jury.
Typically, such information is protected by attorney-client
privilege — a bedrock principle of U.S. legal practice that says a lawyer must
keep confidential what they are told by their clients.
There are some exceptions to that confidentiality, including
in instances where a suspect may have lied to his or her lawyer, causing that
lawyer to unwittingly lie to the government. Howell ruled that in Manafort’s
case, the exception applied and the attorney could be called to testify before
the grand jury.
“The opinion is troubling, because people make
representations to the government all the time through their lawyers, and I
think there’s a general expectation of confidentiality behind the conversations
that go into those representations,’’ said Peter D. Hardy, a partner at the
Ballard Spahr law firm. “It’s widening a door that’s not often used. And the
wider the door gets, maybe the more people will use it.’’
To read more CLICK HERE
No comments:
Post a Comment