University of Virginia law professor Brandon Garrett’s new
book, “End
of Its Rope: How Killing the Death Penalty Can Revive Criminal Justice,”
represents a major new effort to untangle the demise of the death penalty. He also analyzes the
decline for lessons that might be applied to the criminal justice system as a
whole. The Marshall Project asked him:
Why has the death penalty declined?
No one expected this to happen. After all, the death penalty
has long stood for the ultimate in punishment, and it has been very popular for
decades. I felt that understanding the great death penalty decline might help
to show us how we can turn away harsh punishment more broadly.
At the county level, my colleagues and I observed a strong
statistical connection between murder rates and death sentences. But while
declining murder rates matter, it is not the only explanation. Death sentences
fell far more steeply than murders did. Unfortunately, while the decline in
murders played an important role, when Alex Jakubow, Ankur Desai and I analyzed
the past 25 years of death sentencing data, we found a strong county-level
pattern of racial bias. Counties with more black residents have more death
sentences. And counties with more white victims of murder have more death
sentences. Call it a “white lives matter” effect.
We also found a muscle memory effect. Counties impose far
more death sentences just as a function of having done so in the past. This
inertia is powerful. And yet today, when prosecutors seek the death penalty,
they are more often failing to convince jurors to impose it. That reverses the
muscle memory in these offices; to lose an expensive death penalty trial is no
trivial matter. In 15 death penalty trials since 2015 in Texas, only eight have
resulted in death sentences. In Virginia, prosecutors failed to get death
sentences more than half of the time in trials since 2005. Rural counties have
fallen completely off the death penalty map; just a handful of relatively
populous counties still have death sentences.
What I call a “defense lawyering effect” also played an
important role in this death penalty decline. The states that created offices
for defense lawyers experienced significantly more pronounced declines in their
death sentences. The states that continue to leave it to local judges or
counties to decide who handles death penalty cases have more death sentences.
To read more CLICK HERE
No comments:
Post a Comment