There are sculptures of tortoises scattered around the Supreme Court grounds. They symbolize, the court’s website says, “the slow and steady pace of justice,” writes Adam Liptak of The New York Times.
But the court can move fast when it wants to, busting
through protocols and conventions. It did so around 1 a.m. on Saturday,
blocking the Trump administration from deporting a group of Venezuelan migrants
accused of being gang members under a rarely invoked 18th-century wartime law.
The court’s unsigned, one-paragraph order was extraordinary in
many ways. Perhaps most important, it indicated a deep skepticism about whether
the administration could be trusted to live up to the key part of an earlier ruling after the government had deported a
different group of migrants to a prison in El Salvador.
That unsigned and apparently unanimous ruling, issued April
7, said that detainees were entitled to be notified if the government intended
to deport them under the law, “within a reasonable time,” and in a way that
would allow the deportees to challenge the move in court before their removal.
There were indications late Friday that the administration
was poised to violate both the spirit and letter of that ruling. Lawyers for
the detainees said their clients were given notices that they were eligible to
be deported under the law, the Alien Enemies Act. The one-page
notices were written in English, a language many of them do not speak,
the lawyers said. And they provided no realistic opportunity to go to court.
The American Civil Liberties Union, racing against the
clock, filed its emergency application to the Supreme Court on
Friday evening — Good Friday, as it happened — and urged the court to take
immediate action to protect the detainees as part of a proposed class action.
The lawyers told the court that they feared their clients
could be deported within hours, saying that some had already been loaded onto
buses, presumably to be taken to the airport.
The Supreme Court did act fast. “The government is directed
not to remove any member of the putative class of detainees from the United
States until further order of this court,” the order said.
In a typical case, the Supreme Court would await a ruling
from the relevant appeals court, here the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth
Circuit, and ask for a response from the administration, on a deadline set by
the justices.
The justices did neither of those things. Instead, their
unsigned opinion said: “The matter is currently pending before the Fifth
Circuit. Upon action by the Fifth Circuit, the solicitor general is invited to
file a response to the application before this court as soon as possible.”
To read more CLICK HERE
No comments:
Post a Comment