Anti-Blackness as a spectacle is nothing new. White people have long intentionally and joyfully consumed Black misery. Lynchings were common in 19th and 20th century America and were explicitly public occurrences—even family entertainment, with parents and children attending and bringing food and drink, reports The Appeal. Local newspapers would detail the murders, including graphic photos of the victims. Perpetrators and onlookers often took souvenirs from the victims. Prominent white lynchers were lauded by local newspapers and posed with their children near the deceased for photos.
One of the most well-known civilian attacks on a Black
person in American history began on August 20, 1955, when 14-year-old Emmett
Till, a Black boy, was accused of flirting with a white woman while visiting
family in Mississippi. Four days later, the
woman’s husband and his brother brutally beat, shot, and dismembered Till,
then threw his body into a river.
His mother, Mamie Till Mobley, rejected a mortician’s
offer to “touch up” Till’s body. Instead, she chose to have an open
casket funeral exposing her son’s grotesquely mangled form to
illuminate the horrors of Jim Crow segregation and anti-Black racism in
America. An estimated 50,000
people saw Till’s body during his funeral in Chicago. The national
magazine Jet subsequently published photos of his corpse.
While Till’s death was at the hands of civilians
rather than police, Till’s killers felt empowered to murder the boy because of
state-sanctioned segregation and anti-Blackness. But simply publicizing images
of Till’s body was not enough to spark meaningful societal change on its own—it
took nearly a decade of concerted, direct political organizing to pass the
Civil Rights Act of 1964. To this day, despite Till’s story and photos being
taught in school, memorials for Till are routinely defaced
and vandalized. The gruesomeness of his murder is mirrored by the callousness
with which society objectified Till’s corpse and memory.
Civilian footage started proliferating almost 40 years
later. On March 3, 1991, a bystander named George Holliday filmed from his
apartment balcony with a home video camera while a Black man named Rodney
King was beaten by police during his arrest. Officer Lawrence Powell
swung his baton, hitting King in the head and causing him to fall to the
ground. Officers Powell and Timothy Wind continued to viciously beat King.
Holliday sold the video to a local TV station, which then sold it to CNN. The
video became international news and provided explicit, recorded evidence of
anti-Black police brutality. The public wondered once again whether this
footage would be enough to change law enforcement permanently. But in the
decades since, the cycle has only repeated itself. Footage of police officers
killing Eric Garner and George Floyd within the last decade sparked
international protests but little, if any, structural changes to law
enforcement.
Earlier this year, on January 7, 2023, Nichols was
pulled over by Memphis police during a traffic stop. Officers dragged Nichols
from his car, attempted to tase him, and then chased him on foot. When the
police reached Nichols, five
officers pummeled him in the head and body. The officers left Nichols
on the ground for 20 minutes before emergency responders began treating him. He
died three days later. Shortly before the Memphis Police Department released
the footage, Police Chief Cerelyn Davis said the officers showed a “disregard
of basic human rights.” But in the weeks since, the department has done next to
nothing to structurally change the way it polices Memphis, aside from abolishing the
small strike-force-style unit that killed Nichols. While that one team in one
locality may be gone, many similar units still exist around
the country.
These incidents, spanning more than 70 years, each
feature the public supposedly coming face to face with the horrors of
anti-Black violence. In theory, the visualization of violence against Black
people should force viewers to reckon with racism, spurring awareness and
change. But these examples instead make clear that no amount of visual
reckoning with trauma porn can create change on its own. The nation must
dispose of the idea that “activism” means simply sharing videos of police
brutality online, as opposed to actual involvement in political organizing or
community aid.
The consistent portrayal of anti-Black violence not
only solidifies Black people as victims in the minds of white Americans, but
also exposes Black Americans to repeated depictions of their own
dehumanization. In 2016, clinical psychologist Monnica Williams told
PBS that police brutality videos can trigger PTSD-like symptoms in
Black Americans. In 2018, a Harvard
University-led study found that, when police kill an unarmed Black
person, it negatively impacts the mental health of nearby Black residents for
months afterward. Combined with the fact that this footage has so far done
little, if anything, to change American policing, trauma porn is ineffective at
best and immoral at worst.
The only thing that will stop anti-Black violence is
rooting out the anti-Blackness present throughout American culture. In the
words of abolitionist Angela Y. Davis, “in a racist society, it is not enough
to be non-racist, we must be anti-racist.” We must intentionally uplift Black
experiences and address Black people’s needs. There is no need to subject
ourselves to the assault or murder of Black Americans in the interim.
To read more CLICK HERE
No comments:
Post a Comment