The US Supreme Court ruled that there is no standalone “community caretaking” exception to the Fourth Amendment that would allow police to conduct a warrantless search and seizure of a person’s home as part of a welfare check, reported Jurist.
This case, Caniglia v. Strom, involved a welfare check, which led to
police searching and seizing the petitioner’s guns against his wishes. Officers
used false pretext to gain his wife’s consent, then claimed that such
warrantless searches and seizures were permissible under the “community
caretaking” doctrine established in Cady
v. Dombrowski. The decision in Cady allowed police to search an
impounded car for weapons because this kind of search was incidental to their
caretaking duties like maintaining public highways and responding to accidents.
The US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit upheld the
government’s claim that the Cady exception extended to searches and
seizures within the home that are justified by the need to protect the public.
But Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for the majority with three concurrences,
overturned this application of the exception. He said that the home is given
significantly more constitutional protection than the car, which the Cady decision
repeatedly acknowledges. This “unmistakable distinction” suggests that “what is
reasonable for vehicles is different from what is reasonable for homes.”
In his concurrence, Justice Samuel Alito raised several
issues that this opinion did not touch. In particular, he noted that red flag
laws, which allow police to “seize guns pursuant to a court order to prevent
their use for suicide or the infliction of harm on innocent persons,” may be
challenged under the court’s ruling in this case. These laws have passed in
several states as a way to prevent gun violence in abusive domestic situations.
Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s concurrence clarified that police
could still enter a person’s home without a warrant if they were “reasonably trying
to prevent a potential suicide or … help[ing] an elderly person who has
been out of contact and may have fallen and suffered a serious injury.”
To read more CLICK HERE
No comments:
Post a Comment