Matthew T. Mangino
The Crime Report
March 22, 2017
On any given day in the United States there are
about 450,000 people in jail who have not been convicted of anything. According
to the Pretrial Justice Institute,
they cost
taxpayers about $38 million a day.
Those 450,000 people have been charged with a crime,
and all—except for a small percentage facing life in prison—have a right to be
free. These men and women sit in jail because they do not have the money to get
out, pending trial.
Bail is an age-old tool that allows judges to
release defendants pending trial by requiring them to post a certain amount of
money as a way of ensuring they’ll return to court. To make bail, defendants
post collateral, pay the amount in cash or get a bail piece—insurance
policy—from a bail bond company, which typically charges a 10 percent fee.
Let’s do the math. Mr. Smith gets arrested for
assault. The court sets his bail at $1,500. The bail bond company
needs $150 to post Smith’s bail. Smith doesn’t have it, so he sits in
jail for 75 days awaiting trial. Smith pleads guilty and is sentenced to
time served and released.
Because Mr. Smith didn’t have $150, taxpayers
shelled out $85 a day for a whopping $6,375.
Bail serves two purposes: To guarantee that
defendants appear for court; and to protect the public from those who are a
potential threat. Proponents of cash bail say the money to post bail
often comes from family members, and serves as a deterrent to fleeing.
Bail is not punitive. Although violent crime rates
are at historic lows, the Trump Justice Department has made violent crime a top
priority. Attorney General Jeff Sessions would do well to be smart, as
well as tough, on crime. A first step might be setting aside funds for
states who commit to reexamining pretrial detention.
A recent
study in Maryland found that people arrested in the state from 2011 to
2015 paid combined bail premiums of more than $256 million. Those who use the
services of a bail bond company do not get back any of the money paid.
More than 25 percent of that money was paid by people who were acquitted or
never faced trial.
Last fall, Maryland Attorney General Brian E.
Frosh told members of the House of Delegates that judges and court
commissioners must take into account the accused’s ability to pay before
setting bail. According
to the Baltimore Sun, Frosh said that if bail is out of reach for a
defendant, the courts would find that unconstitutional.
Two years ago, New Jersey voters changed the state
constitution to implement a new bail system that focused on expanding
assessments of defendants to determine whether they should be released.
The New Jersey Bail Reform and Speedy Trial Act went
into effect in January. The new law will rely on a computerized risk
assessment tool to make bail decision and is expected to reduce costs and
significantly reduce the state’s jail population.
In New York City, Mayor William de Blasio earmarked
$17.8 million to supervise 3,000 defendants in the community who are awaiting
trial. The “supervised release” initiative permits judges to release defendants
to a supervisory program that allows defendants to remain at home with their
families and continue working while awaiting trial.
Those awaiting trial represent 63 percent of the
total jail population. Less than four out of 10 men and women sitting in
county and local jails are actually serving a sentence. Those sitting in jail
not serving a sentence drain about $14 billion a year from public coffers.
America’s bail system has become a central issue in
the fight to reverse mass incarceration. According to NBC
News, in courthouses, statehouses and ballot boxes across the country,
civil rights lawyers and progressive policymakers are working to curb the
practice of demanding money in exchange for freedom before trial.
“The nation needs to reform its bail system. But it’s
not as simple as saying, ‘Eliminate cash bail,’ ” Kevin Burke, a Minnesota
district judge and past president of the American Judges, Association told Stateline.
According to Burke, judges only get a few minutes to
assess a defendant’s case, and often judges set bail without knowing the full
circumstances.
“The fear (they have) is ‘I’m going to let somebody
go and they’re going to go out and do something terrible, or they won’t come
back, so I’ll set bail,.’” Burke said.
The current bail system denies freedom to thousands
of people who are presumed innocent but are financially challenged. Those who
sit in jail are at risk of losing their jobs, their homes, and their families.
Certainly, it’s unfair to incarcerate someone merely
because they cannot afford bail. It is equally unfair to every man and woman in
America to spend about $1 trillion, according to the Pretrial Justice Institute
on pretrial incarceration, which amounts to about six percent of the Gross
Domestic Product.
According to the
White House Council of Economic Advisers, the use of bail has exploded in
the past two decades, driving a 59 percent rise in the number of un-convicted
jail inmates.
Correcting America’s bail crisis is not out of
reach. This isn’t about being tough on crime. It’s about being
fair. For some, even a nominal bond is out of reach. When an accused has
no money, $1,500 might as well be $150,000.
For taxpayers the issue is just as compelling.
If the cost of pretrial detention could be cut in half, taxpayers could save $7 billion a year. In these challenging economic times those dollars are difficult to ignore.
If the cost of pretrial detention could be cut in half, taxpayers could save $7 billion a year. In these challenging economic times those dollars are difficult to ignore.
.Matthew T. Mangino is of counsel with Luxenberg,
Garbett, Kelly & George P.C. His book The Executioner’s Toll, 2010 was
released by McFarland Publishing. You can reach him at www.mattmangino.com and follow him
on Twitter @MatthewTMangino. He welcomes readers’ comments.
Visit The Crime Report CLICK HERE
Visit The Crime Report CLICK HERE
No comments:
Post a Comment